> I agree that seeing that give me more motivation to try and help > adding eyecandyness to RB.
It is just so hard to find a solution that everybody likes =) > The iTunes developpers have the advantage of mastering their UI. > RB has to deal with the current limitations of Gtk: no official OpenGL > support yet, no canvas widget. Then there is the themeing thing that > force the separation of blinks and functionnality. That's not a > problem for a widget that would mimick Coverflow, because the aspect > and the functionnality are very tight in that case. The List widget in GTK (which is found under Depricated in Glade) is that what iTunes 7 is now using for Source? Why would gtk.org depricate that widget? I think the new iTunes Source list is much more polished; after all, with the header it looks like the list can be sorted, which it can't. So I am pro no header =) _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
