On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 01:58 +0200, Mika Wahlroos wrote: > I do. Perhaps not so much directly, but indirectly. Traditionally, when > I create a new playlist it appears at the end of the group. It's obvious > where it goes, and I can easily find it when filling it with tracks from > the library. At least for me it's quite common to do that a lot when > creating a playlist, so having the playlist easily locatable is perhaps > even more important at that point than in other situations.
Having it move itself once you entered a name for the playlist would be a bit disconcerting. I've just noticed an oddity, it only seems to alphabetise the playlists on startup. > I guess it doesn't matter so much, but unless there's a seriously high > number of playlists, I fail to see how alphabetical listing would make > finding a playlist significantly easier than having them in a random > order would. If you do have such a large number of playlists, having better organisation method would probably be useful. Such as the sometimes requested "playlist folders". For a relatively small number of playlists, it probably doesn't make such of a difference, as you say. > Please correct me if there's actual evidence to the > contrary, because mine is just a gut feeling. On the other hand, being > able to order the items in the list so that they make sense in some > other, more personal way would seem to make finding things on the list easy. I don't really have enough playlists myself to be affected by it, but it sounds like people with a reasonable number of playlists find manual sorting useful. Cheers, James "Doc" Livingston -- I think I've finally worked out why the Irish drink Guinness. It's to lubricate their throat so they can speak their own language. -- David P. _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
