On 3/21/07, Softpedia Editorial Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An in-depth review of your product "Rhythmbox" has been published at the > following address: > http://www.softpedia.com/reviews/linux/Rhythmbox-Review-49941.shtml
The review states, "The Truth: Rhythmbox is a very good audio player with useful features; unfortunately, there are a few players that offer the same functionality as Rhythmbox, an then some, so it's hard to choose Rhythmbox as your default player, unless you like a more simple player or you're on a slow PC." A) Why are choices unfortunate? B) How many players are there that really offer the same functionality? The only ones that I know that come close are Banshee (which is not nearly as mature as RB) and Amarok (which fits a completely different design goal). (I'm not being vitriolic here... seriously, I'd like to know what *my* choices are. :) It almost seems like the reviewer is talking about players on any desktop environment.... C) It's actually quite easy to choose Rhythmbox as one's default application. ;) Cheers, Andrew _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
