On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 16:04 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > At 2:33p -0400 on Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Sol wrote: > > As far as I can tell the implicit order of tracks depends on "track > > number" and "disc number". Are you aware of the "disc number" meta data > > field? A prerequisite is that all Discs of your multi-cd-box share the > > same "album" name. This should give you exactly what you asked for (at > > least it works for me;). > > On this note, something that has bugged me (but not enough to file a > feature request) is that I can only order by one explicit attribute at a > time. That is, if I click on Artist, Rhythmbox orders the entire > viewable collection by the artists' names. > > If I then click on Genre, it orders the entire viewable collection by > genre. This is *sometimes* what I want, but other times I want to order > by the Artist, and then within each artist, order by the genre. > > Since I note there is development talk about perhaps using SQLite > (rhythmdb/DESIGN), I'll point out that this is very easy to do in SQL: > > SELECT title, artist, genre FROM songs ORDER BY artist, genre; > > As far as user interface, I think a single click would update the > current result set (i.e. Click on Artist to order by artist, then click > on Genre to sub-order by <Artist, Genre>) > > Kevin
Shouldn't a good 'ol playlist cover everything that is not already covered by the browser view? I mean, there will always be some type of view that cannot be displayed by the browser, but you can lay out your songs anyway you want with a playlist > _______________________________________________ > rhythmbox-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
