Gareth,

Sorry for the delayed reply.  No, it will not open 1k local sockets in the 
cluster - all requests within the cluster are done via Erlang messaging, which 
is abstracted away from the application and managed by the Erlang VM.

Sean Cribbs <[email protected]>
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/

On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Gareth Stokes wrote:

> Hrrm, Im finding a need for this feature as well. 
> Thinking the MapReduce solution is probably the safest bet seeing as I can't 
> really limit my users to a N gets of under 20 or so. 
> 
> In the hypothetical world, if I perform a MapReduce over say 1k different 
> keys, are you saying that would open 1k local sockets on my riak cluster?
> 
> On 31 March 2010 03:13, TuX RaceR <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks John, for the link to your ruby code.
> To get a faster answer probably an native (erlang) solution would beat a HTTP 
> solution.
> If you request 100 keys, then you'll need to open 100 HTTP sockets and then 
> 100 erlang sockets (or maybe there is a ruse of connections).
> Also I am wondering how this scales.
> The optimistic me would say that doing N gets in parallel would take just as 
> long as doing 1 get. ;)
> This may be true for N low (say 10 or 20) but probably false for larger 
> values of N (e.g. 100) ;)
> 
> Thanks
> TuX
> 
> 
> John Lynch wrote:
> TuX,
> 
> You can also issue multiple concurrent HTTP requests yourself, I have an 
> example of doing this with Ruby/Typhoeus here:    http://bit.ly/9h1eF9
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> John Lynch, CTO
> Rigel Group, LLC
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Grant Schofield <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
>    On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:50 AM, TuX RaceR wrote:
> 
>    > Hello Riak Users,
>    >
>    > This is another newbie question:
>    > I am reading the doc at
>    > http://riak.basho.com/edoc/riak_client.html
>    > and was wondering if there was support for a multiget function,
>    i,.e. having a list of (bucket_i,key_i) (or
>    (bucket,(key_1,key_2,key_3...)) do concurrently a get on each
>    (bucket,key).
>    > As erlang is presented as a 'concurrency oriented' programming
>    language, I'd guess it should be rather easy to do.
>    > Or is such a use case not recommended as being too slow? What
>    would be the limiting speed factor in such a case: disk speed
>    (random access) or network speed?
>    >
> 
>    There currently isn't a multiget function, but there aren't any
>    major limitations preventing us from adding it. The one concern
>    might be error reporting (IE you request 100 keys and 1 fails),
>    but that shouldn't be too hard to work around.  I have opened a
>    bug (http://issues.basho.com/show_bug.cgi?id=96) to track this
>    feature request.
> 
>    One way to work around the lack of multiget would be to pass the
>    keys you want as input to a map/reduce query and return the
>    result, but you wouldn't have the ability to change the R value
>    like you do with a standard get request.
> 
>    > Also I am wondering about how links walking (or mapred)
>    internally works. Does riak do concurrent multi gets based on link
>    keys, wait for all the answers, and then present the whole result ?
> 
>    Multiget isn't done for map/reduce and links. A get is performed
>    for each of the objects sent to the map phase, but those gets and
>    the map code are done on the local node on which the key exists.
> 
>    Thanks for the feature request.
> 
>    Grant Schofield
>    Developer Advocate
>    Basho Technologies, Inc.
>    _______________________________________________
>    riak-users mailing list
>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>    http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to