On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Dan Reverri <[email protected]> wrote:
> This list_keys method is updated asynchronously so it may not immediately
> reflect the addition or removal of keys. The list_keys method should
> eventually reflect the deletion of the key. Can you try running list_keys
> after a delay?
We have just run the following command:
(r...@macbook-siden)9> C:list_keys(<<"aaa">>).
{ok,[<<"key1">>]}
it still shows the same information (it has been about 5 hours since
we run the first C:list_keys command).
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Alexander Zhuravlev
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are having an issue with riak_client:list_keys function.
>> The thing is that the function returns information about the keys which
>> were successfully deleted from a bucket. For example, please check
>> output from our tests below:
>>
>> (r...@macbook-siden)1> {ok, C} =
>> riak:client_connect('r...@macbook-siden').
>> {ok,{riak_client,'r...@macbook-siden',<<7,122,127,92>>}}
>> (r...@macbook-siden)2> O0 = riak_object:new(<<"aaa">>, <<"key1">>,
>> "val1").
>> {r_object,<<"aaa">>,<<"key1">>,
>> [{r_content,{dict,0,16,16,8,80,48,
>> {[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],...},
>> {{[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],...}}},
>> "val1"}],
>> [],
>> {dict,1,16,16,8,80,48,
>> {[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],...},
>> {{[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],...}}},
>> undefined}
>> (r...@macbook-siden)3> C:put(O0, 2).
>> ok
>> (r...@macbook-siden)4> C:list_keys(<<"aaa">>).
>> {ok,[<<"key1">>]}
>> (r...@macbook-siden)5> C:delete(<<"aaa">>, <<"key1">>, 2).
>> ok
>> (r...@macbook-siden)6> C:get(<<"aaa">>, <<"key1">>, 2).
>> {error,notfound}
>> (r...@macbook-siden)7> C:list_keys(<<"aaa">>).
>> {ok,[<<"key1">>]}
>>
>> backend = ets
>> riak 0.9.1
>>
>> As you can see the key was successfully deleted (as it can be confirmed by
>> the output from riak_client:get call), but riak_client:list_keys still
>> reports that the key
>> exists in the bucket. Is this the intended behavior of did we hit a bug in
>> riak?
>> Please advise.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Zhuravlev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
--
Alexander Zhuravlev
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
