Hi! Cool story but you messages take a broken links :(
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:05, NevB <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I came across this thread in the Erlang group and thought the Riak > team might find it interesting. > > Please forgive me if its not relevant to Riak > > Kind Regards > > Neville > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Joel Reymont <[email protected]> > Date: Oct 25, 12:56 am > Subject: couchdb performace 10x: using NIF for file io > To: Erlang Programming > > > Simply switching to NIFs for file IO seems to have improved CouchDB > write performance more than ten-fold. > > Compare the old graph > > http://graphs.mikeal.couchone.com/#/graph/62b286fbb7aa55a4b0c4cc913c0... > > to the new graph > > http://graphs.mikeal.couchone.com/#/graph/62b286fbb7aa55a4b0c4cc913c0... > > I was under the impression that the Erlang IO subsystem was highly > optimized but there seems to be no limit to perfection. > > NIFs are a giant black hole that will subsume Erlang code as > performance has to be improved. Start at the lowest level and keep > moving up. All that will be left of Erlang in the end is 99.99999% > uptime, fault tolerance and supervision... of optimized C code. It's > swell and I'm all for it! > > Patch is here: > > http://github.com/wagerlabs/couchdb/commit/23527eb8165f81e63d47b230f3... > > ---http://twitter.com/wagerlabs > > ________________________________________________________________ > erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list. > Seehttp://www.erlang.org/faq.html > To unsubscribe; mailto:[email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > -- wbr, Kirill
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
