On 17 Mar 2011, at 13:57, Abhishek Kona wrote: > Yes. > Earlier query : > http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-March/003461.html
Right, I remember now. At the moment I'm inclined toward leaving the job of load balancing to a load balancer (like haproxy.) I guess it is feasible to add something like this to the Java client, maybe with naive (RR) load balancing, but done as a strategy so more sophisticated load balancing could be contributed. The Riak cluster is an elastic thing and adding/removing nodes is operationally normal; load balancing is a problem in its own right. At the moment I'd say it is only a tentative yes for some future version. Of course a barrage of +1s would encourage a re-think. > -Abhishek Kona > > On 17/03/11 7:17 PM, Russell Brown wrote: >> I'm sorry but I don't understand, do you want the client to load balance >> across a Riak cluster rather than just speak to one node? >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
