On 24 Mar 2011, at 06:07, Wilson MacGyver wrote: > On Mar 23, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Jon Brisbin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I personally don't like using ambiguous short names. I get that you can >> technically distinguish things by package name but using a simple name that >> is very common isn't good for code readability. "RiakEntry" is unambiguous, >> self-documenting, and semantically correct. "Entry" would, in my mind, >> represent a very generic interface that defined various kinds of "Entry"s of >> things. >> > > Likewise, I'd like to suggest RiakDoc
I can see why but I think that might be too specific, not every entry in riak is a document (but every document in riak is an entry.) > _______________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
