Sean I'm looking at this page "http://wiki.basho.com/PBC-API.html";. Did you have a different one in mind?
Dave On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that's correct (LTV). The wiki page should explain this fairly well. > > Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> > Developer Advocate > Basho Technologies, Inc. > http://basho.com/ > > On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Mike Oxford wrote: > > So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format. > > Good to know, thanks for the clarification! > > For anyone writing a basic client: > http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutorial.html > Substitute with iostreams fed from the network and there you go. > > -mox > > > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I didn't permanently abandon it, but it was much more fiddly than doing >> the same thing in pure Ruby. I have plans to deliver separate "native" >> Protocol Buffers libraries for MRI and JRuby (at least) in 1.0 of the Ruby >> client. >> >> Because it's being confused in this conversation, I think it merits >> clarification -- the "protocol" that is used to talk to Riak and Google's >> Protocol Buffers are NOT the same thing. Riak uses a simple length- and >> message-code-prefixed binary protocol, in which the complex messages (ones >> that have bodies and not just the message code) are serialized via Google's >> Protocol Buffers. So, while we don't use the RPC facilities in Google's >> library, the *serialization format* DOES use Protocol Buffers. >> >> Sorry for the confusion, we'll work to make that clearer in the wiki. >> >> Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> >> Developer Advocate >> Basho Technologies, Inc. >> http://basho.com/ >> >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Scott Gonyea wrote: >> >> They are the same and you can actually see me plugging into the C++ code >> here: >> >> https://github.com/sgonyea/pabst/tree/master/ext >> >> But as part of an Objective-C library (called ObjFW). So, the code is >> actually an Objective-C++ wrapper around the C++ PB code, that exchanges >> messages with Objective-C code (that hooks into Ruby). >> >> I believe Sean Cribbs has some initial C++-wrapper code in his Ripple >> repo... Though he eventually abandoned it after C++ left him permanently >> cross-eyed (I think that's why). >> >> Scott >> >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Mike Oxford wrote: >> >> Be careful here.. >> >> I do not thing Riak's "protocol buffers" are the same as Google's protocol >> buffers. >> Google's does bit-level packing and some other tricks that Riak does not >> do, even though they both use the ".proto" file extension and very very >> similar proto semantics. >> >> That said, if they ARE the same, then you can take the .proto files and >> generate C++ classes, and use the secondary library "protobuf-c" to generate >> C structs for the wire format. >> >> -mox >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, David Leimbach <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Spent a little time poking at this today... Kind of surprised that there >>> was no message defined for PingReq or for listing buckets. >>> >>> I realize these messages really have no usable payload, and just sort of >>> have a tag and length, but for completeness it kind of feels like they >>> should be there. >>> >>> Of course I'm not a Protocol Buffers expert in any sense, so I can't say >>> whether this is a normal kind of choice or not. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Scott Gonyea <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If we had this then a C-wrapper would be that much more attainable. So, >>>> the author of such a lib would be a superstar in my book :). >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:46 PM, David Leimbach <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > I've been writing a bit of code in Haskell to push data to Riak, and >>>> the bindings are pretty easy to use (Thanks Brian!), but getting >>>> penetration >>>> at my company for Haskell is going to take a little time. >>>> > >>>> > As such I'm just wondering if anyone knows of anyone working on a >>>> protocol buffers version of a Riak client in C++, or if this is going to be >>>> something I'll have to take on. >>>> > >>>> > I've found a few generic looking C++ projects that use Boost's >>>> asynchronous IO stuff with protocol buffers to make an RPC system, but I'm >>>> not sure if any of those are implicitly compatible. >>>> > >>>> > Guess I'm just looking for a pointer... >>>> > >>>> > Dave >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > riak-users mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
