What about Ubuntu? (assuming your usual Debian package works for Ubuntu)
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I've been corrected by our release manager. We have quit building > and supporting 32-bit binaries for RHEL as of 0.14.x (0.14.0 was the last, > and a manual build at that). Unless strong demand appears for a 32-bit RHEL > package, we won't be releasing any more. > > > Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> > Developer Advocate > Basho Technologies, Inc. > http://basho.com/ > > On Jun 13, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Thomas Fee wrote: > > I noticed the riak-search prebuilt binaries for RedHat are all 64bits. Is > this merely a reflection of memory needs or of something more fundamental? > Mainly for development and QA, it would be bad if the unified riak couldn't > be downloaded and installed for 32bits. > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Ryan Zezeski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Riak Users, >> >> I'm happy to announce that Riak Search has now been integrated with Riak >> in the master branch. >> >> >> https://github.com/basho/riak/commit/1a4daa717ce9bb627e72fb7c32dda2ec84e02e92 >> >> To use Search you no longer checkout the riak_search repo. Instead, you >> checkout riak, build a release as you usually would, and then enable the >> Search functionality. It should be fairly obvious how to do this by looking >> at `app.config` but there is a small README in the riak_search repo going >> over this (which I should probably move into the Riak README). >> >> https://github.com/basho/riak_search >> >> Along with the integration work we have also decided to drop support for >> JVM based analyzers (i.e. the Qilr application was removed). While our >> analyzers are not nearly as sophisticated as what is provided by Lucene we >> engaged with the community and our customers and found that very few, if >> any, are making use of this functionality. Considering the cruft and >> general awkwardness this caused to the riak_search code base we figured it >> was best to remove this support for now. Furthermore, this support was not >> free in that there was overhead that had to be paid for talking with the >> JVM instances running these analyzers. This doesn't mean we won't possibly >> support more advanced analyzers in the future but for now we have what we >> need for the majority of use cases. >> >> Finally, please bear with us while we update documentation and refine the >> Search/Riak integration over the next couple of months. >> >> -Ryan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
