The "ring_creation_size" parameter in app.config must be set before the node
has been started and written a ring file. Assuming the LevelDB node is
empty, you can do the following:

1. Stop the node
2. Clear out the data directories (data/ring, data/leveldb, data/bitcask,
data/mr_queue, data/kv_vnode)
3. Verify "ring_creation_size" is set to 256 in the app.config file
4. Start the node
5. Verify "ring_num_partitions" in "riak-admin status" is 256
6. Join the node to the cluster

Thanks,
Dan

Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
[email protected]


On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:30 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> 64 on the LevelDB vs 256 on the Bitcask.  I guess that’s it.   Workaround?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Jim****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Dan Reverri [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2011 9:27 AM
> *To:* Jim Adler
> *Cc:* Ian Plosker; riak-users
> *Subject:* Re: Riak 1.0****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Jim,****
>
> ** **
>
> Can you check "ring_num_partitions" on each node from "riak-admin status"?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
> Dan****
>
>
> Daniel Reverri
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> [email protected]
>
> ****
>
> 2011/10/20 Jim Adler <[email protected]>****
>
> I tried the Bitcask-to-LevelDB procedure on 1.0.1 to switch my backend from
> Bitcask to LevelDB. I have one node on Bitcask with my data and the other
> node with a fresh LevelDB backend. When I join the fresh LevelDB node, I get
> the following error:  Failed: [email protected] has a different
> ring_creation_size****
>
>  ****
>
> riak-admin status | grep creation gives:  ring_creation_size : 256****
>
>  ****
>
> Any ideas?****
>
>  ****
>
> Jim****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ian Plosker
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 01, 2011 8:15 AM
> *To:* 54chen
> *! Cc:* riak-users
> *Subject:* Re: Riak 1.0****
>
>  ****
>
> There are instructions on the wiki:
> http://wiki.basho.com/Secondary-Indexes.html#Migrating-an-Existing-Cluster-(Method-One)
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Basically, you will have each node leave the cluster, switch the backend,
> and then rejoin. The process is something like this:****
>
>  ****
>
> 1) Issue `riak-admin leave` and wait for all transfers to complete****
>
> 2) `riak stop`****
>
> 3) Change the backend to the `riak_kv_eleveldb_backend`****
>
> 4) `riak start` and `riak-admin join <a_node>`****
>
> 5) Repeat for each node in the cluster****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Ian Plosker****
>
> Developer Advocate****
>
> Basho Technologies****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:41 PM, 54chen wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> Congratulations!
>
> Can you give me an example of how the 0.14.2(bitcas! k) upgrade to 1.0(
> levelDB)?
>
> ****
>
> 2011/10/1 Alexander Sicular <[email protected]>****
>
> Awesome!
>
> Already got it in place on my mac and ubuntu dev boxes. Smooth.
>
> -Alexander Sicular
>
> @siculars
> http://siculars.posterous.com****
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:31 PM, David Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am very pleased to announce that Riak 1.0 is tagged and officially
> > ready for downloading.
> >
> > Pre-built installations and source tarballs are available at:
> >
> > http://downloads.basho.com/riak/CURRENT
> >
> > Release notes are here:
> >
> > https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.0/RELEASE-NOTES.org<https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.0/RELE!%20ASE-NOTES.org>
> >
> > There is also a blog post about the release here:
> >
> > http://blog.basho.com/2011/09/30/Riak-1-dot-0-is-Official/
> >
> > 1.0 has been two years and 15 releases in the making. Thank you all
> > for being a part of this project and wonderful community. We couldn't
> > have done it without you.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > D.
> >
> > --
> > Dave Smith
> > Director, Engineering
> > Basho Technologies, Inc.
> > [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > riak-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users 
> > _lists.basho.com<http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.c!%20om>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com****
>
>
>
>
> --
> -
> http://www.54chen.com
> http://twitter.com/54chen
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com****
>
> ** **
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to