On 24 Oct 2011, at 20:21, Alexander Robbins wrote: > Using a new Riak 1.0 cluster. > > We added data in with a secondary index. When getting the data back out the > results list is odd. > > [null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, > null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, a, c, 9, d, 9, 1, d, d, 0, e, > 5, 5, 6, 8, c, 6, d, 4, 8, f, > e1b865342e2d81fac6b99dfa157dd8550ecc0b68caad2fb55c12e9fa5b1532c2, > 85dca536068b8ead86c14c009c8a919457d2326419c16e0cd7f3b23a8776e2c8, > be2f346c56827912cc4e21b765bd28d520a46833d08b8207ca6b49c8da2351d2, > 1907d031c88b8df2fc5128114615133d4184cedaea55964c3cee0ef9fe566f13, > 1bb5ce4aba0bf240698876530948c807d50e6f04a7358b7514c756dd295775ae, > 1f5f8f78951c6842ad6bcc96e3839ca8240b71372d2ab4826411fdfc84fedeb1, > 330856dabfa3a1c5b9ca8051686d8d7f387a23c795493a4e8f33d84861756d4f, > 338fffb9740b2f0c50b2da52a73b4861be318868082db3748eb95a47654981bd, > 5eef2b9cd6f7faf34548c9700069527287574690ab3dabf4c4f186753ffc5417, > 7ec9217a7a87c9e43a94170bb1ab8c13566233823ef6f77ef9c455a289c4bdf8, > a588d7f0fb413d52a895a5d7e7fcfc966e9a56c42456e7821d2e5fa93b5671ba, > 767655d6443a337b2d3d89c0d1c38c3bac62398b74e0deef572508c54a2ad8b1, > 7ca77aa38e44942d769ab8b08753b008ad65fe5d0d8c6438b67849381300aa9f, > ab0a791a5a82345c5adce2c0d0d9013bab176e430d335228355781aa23a87f3e, > b42af37baa18e715ca64a7145783cd3fd0defa9b2dc18368ec4c647cbe710132, > c4d9c7b2cd837294cca10a581976a3f6d93d74cb2d30cac48384c64fc0bb6e2c, > c7c10ad62091e3c7ba304d8a58f02c180c76f47d8d1d4addb21b9a88da277e75, > 127f5b7255d61fcf0477a53d242c248cca824d9e60dafffc244d8e9df2bf7cbf, > 23636fa4ef8af2a1d26335a3c8daca24ec5cd7978ee2429615e2b60538d6c9e9, > 385d59cc404d3c7f097b2ae9e0e82768ac980c9ba157f6ea77d91ad49e812469, [, > mentions, 50c2c9983e2ea3806c6d5e34a19ed526844945d0a06c70557695dfaa15b70ba3] > > The 64 character strings are good. They exist in riak and can be loaded. The > other results make less sense. null, a, c, 9, [, and "mentions" aren't valid > keys. Any ideas what might have happened that the results from a fetchIndex > would have invalid keys? There are always 20 null responses and 20 single > character responses. The single character responses vary from request to > request. The "[" and "mentions" keys show up every time too. I'm confused > here, because I don't think this could be me adding bad data. This list > should be valid keys, as determined by riak, right?
They should be valid keys, yes. To help narrow the issue down, could you run the same query using the Java HTTP Client, please? The HTTP Client uses the HTTP 2i endpoint, whereas the PB client uses map/reduce behind the scenes. Cheers Russell > > There is a possibility that another bucket has index values with multibyte > characters. Could that be breaking results in a separate bucket. > > Thanks in advance, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
