Yes I noticed that it is a work around. I can bump the version beyond 4.2.x
and re-compile the riak-client, but can riak make a note of this as a
known-issue through a Github-Issue or buzilla (or whatever it is that you
use to track tasks) so you can get around to it later when you find the
time ?

Thank you for your help Guido.

- Deepak

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Guido Medina <[email protected]>wrote:

>  The pull request doesn't fix the HttpClient issue, it is more like a
> workaround the issue in the code, if you notice, even if they didn't
> upgrade the POM, the issue won't be reproduced by the riak java client.
>
>
> On 24/09/12 20:13, Deepak Balasubramanyam wrote:
>
> Guido,
>
>  Reading the comments on that pull request, I get the feeling that pcl is
> suggesting that upgrading to 4.2.2 is another way to solve the problem. I
> dont think that route was taken to resolve the issue. Quoting his
> comment...
>
>   upgrading your dependency to 4.2.2 once it becomes available will 
> *also*resolve the issue
>>
>
>
>  I dont see a change to pom.xml during this pull. I tried the riak-client
> 1.0.6 and it still depends on 4.1.x. So the upgrade would be necessary to
> fix the memory leak.
>
>  Thanks
> Deepak Bala
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Guido Medina 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  Deepak,
>>
>>   I think that was fixed on the following pull request but, you would
>> have to compile your own client from github which is easy; or, did you get
>> the new 1.0.6? I'm not sure if it is already available at maven repos,
>> anyways, there is a lot going on in the riak client in java, I would
>> suggest you to keep an eye on the github, many good bugs getting fixed
>> quickly.
>>
>> https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/pull/159
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Guido
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24/09/12 19:45, Deepak Balasubramanyam wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>  My servers complain about a leaky apache DateUtils class during hot
>> deployments. This is a known 
>> bug<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1216>in http 4.1.x and 
>> has been fixed in 4.2.x. Can the next version of
>> riak-client be updated to include the newer HTTP client (the
>> current version is 4.1.1 ) ? Is the riak-client compatible with httpclient
>> 4.2.x as it is ?
>>
>>  Thanks
>> Deepak Bala
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to