Ya, I would probably say more vm's mean less vnodes per vm. I would most likely go in that direction...
-Alexander Sicular @siculars On Dec 5, 2012, at 7:33 PM, Ken Perkins wrote: > Hello all, > > We're seeing enough thrashing and low-memory on our production ring that > we've decided to upgrade our hardware. The real question is should we scale > up or out. > > Currently our ring is 512 partitions. We know that it's a sub-optimal size > but we can't easily solve that now. We're currently running a search-heavy > app on 5 8GB VMs. I'm debating between moving the VMs up to 16GB, or adding a > few more 8GB VMs. > > Some of the talk in #riak has pushed me towards adding more machines (thus > lowering the per node number of partitions) but I wanted to do a quick sanity > check here with folks that it's better than scaling up my current machines. > > Thanks! > Ken Perkins > clipboard.com > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
