Hi,
Can someone confirm this? If it's true, what exactly is the purpose of
offering the if_not_modified flag?
Kaspar
On Dec 28, 2012 1:51 PM, "Daniil Churikov [via Riak Users]" <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Riak doesn't have atomic updates. This if_not_modified does not gives you
> any guaranties. Best way to handle with simultaneously updates is try to
> engineer scheme so that only one client makes concurrent updates and in
> case of conflict any sibling will be good for you. Another option is try to
> use convergent data types [0][1]
> [0] https://github.com/basho/riak_dt
> [1] https://github.com/mochi/statebox_riak
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Atomicity-of-if-not-modified-tp4026430p4026431.html
> To unsubscribe from Atomicity of if_not_modified?, click
> here<http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4026430&code=c25vb3Blcjc3QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0MDI2NDMwfDUzOTU0NjI0OQ==>
> .
> NAML<http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Atomicity-of-if-not-modified-tp4026430p4026465.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
