I see.. So we'd trust developers (well, just me at the moment), not mess the other app up? As one can say, add a link to an /*app1*.user/johnsmith to /*app2*.posts/peterpan by mistake?
Different scenario, what about uat vs prod? I suppose a separate cluster would make good sense? ie, 2 x 10 node cluster, buckets prefixed by app ? Or would you have prefixes with <env> + <app> + <bucket> ? Jimmy. On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Guido Medina <guido.med...@temetra.com>wrote: > Neither or both mixed? You could have prefixes per buckets and have N > applications per cluster and add a 5 nodes cluster as needed, so that you > can host as many per cluster, that way you know each bucket prefix point to > an specific app. > > Hope that helps, > > Guido. > > > On 19/01/13 17:26, Jeremiah Peschka wrote: > > That really depends on what you hope to accomplish. > > If you want both applications to have the same performance > characteristics, then go with option 1. > If you want the fun of troubleshooting two applications to figure out why > one application is having performance problems, go with option 2. > > Is there any reason you can't use different bucket names to run a single > riak cluster? > > --- > Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited > MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP > Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jimmy Ho <j...@jimmyho.com> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I knew a similar questions have been asked, but would like to find out >> what are some sensible ways to deploy riak for both for multiple >> applications, or even uat + prod environments. >> >> Let's assume I have a budget for 10 servers. >> >> I have two applications I wish to deploy into PROD (hence needing two >> 'databases'). >> >> Would it make sense to, >> >> 1. build two clusters, 5 nodes each, for each of the app, completely >> isolated. >> 2. build two cluster, each host to have two instances of riak, ie >> forming a 2 x 10node clusters >> >> Another assumption: both apps have similar resource consumption at >> anyone time. >> >> Which would would benefit the most from riak's distributed architecture >> ? >> >> I suppose I am trying to explore ways to maximise server utilisation. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jimmy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing > listriak-users@lists.basho.comhttp://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
