Thanks, Russell.

In that case I have one more argument to upgrade to 1.3.0 :) I'll try to 
confirm that we are hitting this issue and see if we can fix it by applying the 
proper patch.


On 24.02.2013, at 16:10, Russell Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 24 Feb 2013, at 15:01, Sebastian Cohnen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Can you confirm that the PR didn't made it into 1.3.0? It was closed about 
>> two four weeks ago...
> 
> It is not in 1.3. We actually had the code freeze for 1.3.0 a _long_ time ago 
> (I think it was 16th Nov 2012) and this fix did not make it in time for the 
> freeze.
> 
> Sorry,
> 
> Russell
>> 
>> I think I'm hitting the same issue here. In one project I'm using last write 
>> wins and the read repair count is ridiculously high. I'm hoping that this 
>> might also help reducing the latency problem we are seeing for the 99th+ 
>> percentiles of requests.
>> 
>> 
>> On 22.02.2013, at 09:24, Russell Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> It is fixed in master, but it doesn't look like it made it into 1.3.0. If 
>>> you're ok with building from source, I tried it and a patch from 
>>> 8895d2877576af2441bee755028df1a6cf2174c7 goes cleanly onto 1.3.0.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to