On another node the console.log looks like:

 

2013-03-12 18:41:19.687 [info] <0.7.0> Application riak_kv started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:19.709 [info] <0.7.0> Application merge_index started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:19.719 [info] <0.7.0> Application riak_search started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:19.724 [info] <0.473.0>@riak_core:wait_for_application:419 
Wait complete for application riak_kv (0 seconds)

2013-03-12 18:41:19.782 [info] <0.7.0> Application riak_api started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:19.846 [info] <0.7.0> Application cluster_info started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:19.867 [info] <0.7.0> Application riak_control started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:19.868 [info] <0.7.0> Application erlydtl started on node 
'[email protected]'

2013-03-12 18:41:20.471 [info] <0.296.0>@riak_core:wait_for_service:439 Wait 
complete for service riak_kv (1 seconds)

 

And in erlang.log  I see:

 

18:41:19.513 [info] New capability: {riak_kv,vnode_vclocks} = true^M

18:41:19.526 [info] New capability: {riak_kv,legacy_keylisting} = false^M

18:41:19.541 [info] New capability: {riak_kv,listkeys_backpressure} = true^M

18:41:19.558 [info] New capability: {riak_kv,mapred_system} = pipe^M

18:41:19.582 [info] New capability: {riak_kv,mapred_2i_pipe} = true^M

18:41:19.623 [info] Waiting for application riak_kv to start (0 seconds).^M

18:41:19.687 [info] Application riak_kv started on node '[email protected]'^M

18:41:19.709 [info] Application merge_index started on node 
'[email protected]' ^H^M

18:41:19.719 [info] Application riak_search started on node 
'[email protected]' ^H^M

18:41:19.724 [info] Wait complete for application riak_kv (0 seconds)^M

18:41:19.782 [info] Application riak_api started on node '[email protected]'^M

18:41:19.846 [info] Application cluster_info started on node 
'[email protected]'^M

18:41:19.867 [info] Application riak_control started on node 
'[email protected]'^M

18:41:19.868 [info] Application erlydtl started on node '[email protected]'^M

Eshell V5.9.1  (abort with ^G)^M

([email protected])1> 18:41:20.471 [info] Wait complete for service riak_kv (1 
seconds)^M

 

===== ALIVE Tue Mar 12 19:09:45 CDT 2013



I don’t see any errors there.

 

There is an empty crash.log that was dated with a timestamp recently.

 

From: riak-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Jeremiah Peschka
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:34 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Error interpretation

 

Your Riak search hook crashed. There is a bad argument being sent to Erlang. 
Check your Riak logs for more detail.


--

Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited

MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP

Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop


On Mar 12, 2013, at 4:23 PM, "Kevin Burton" <[email protected]> wrote:

I am writing a value to a 4 node Riak cluster with a CorrugatedIron client and 
am getting the following error:

 

Riak returned an error. Code '0'. Message: 
{precommit_fail,{hook_crashed,{riak_search_kv_hook,precommit,error,badarg}}}

 

I don’t know how to interpret this error. Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thank you.

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to