What you saw is actually quite typical when using R=1.

When you turn off a node, Riak's sloppy quorum behavior will kick in and hand 
off some of your read requests to an empty data partition to supplement the two 
remaining partitions that still have a copy. Since the partition is empty, it 
can respond very quickly with a message indicating that the object cannot be 
found.

By default, Riak will treat the absence of an object as a definitive statement 
of "we don't have a copy of that."

If R=2 or R=3, Riak would wait for another partition to respond before 
replying, but since R=1 the first reply wins. You should find that a 2nd 
request succeeds, because read repair will kick in and distribute a copy of the 
object to that empty partition.

Rather than increasing the R value, you can also manipulate this behavior using 
the notfound_ok configuration variable.

See http://basho.com/riaks-config-behaviors-part-3/ for a more detailed 
explanation, specifically the "notfound tuning" section, and 
http://basho.com/riaks-config-behaviors-epilogue/ for a list of links to the 
full series.

-John

On Oct 9, 2013, at 9:50 AM, kzhang <[email protected]> wrote:

> We have a 5 node riak cluster to store site images,  with N=3, R=1.  When we
> turned off one node, a lot of GET requests failed, which made me think those
> requested images (3 copies of them) all landed on the failed physical node.
> Is there a way to tell how the replicas are distributed among the physical
> nodes, and if there is a way to re-distribute them if all copies of the same
> key-value are on the same machine?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/distribution-of-data-among-riak-cluster-physical-nodes-tp4029398.html
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to