The nodes were a bit out of synch (up to 30 seconds… looking into why ntp wasn’t working!). So far it appears this was the issue. I’ll let you know as I continue testing. Thank you!
Dave On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:01 PM, John Daily <[email protected]> wrote: > How well-synchronized are your system clocks? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Greenstein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> We’re doing new puts with a blank vector clock. There are several seconds >> between updates to the object though. >> >> Dave >> >> >>> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Andrew Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:57:12PM -0400, David Greenstein wrote: >>>> >>>> One other thing that might be worth mentioning here is the writes I’m >>>> mentioning are actually updates to existing objects. The object exists, an >>>> attempt to write an update for the object appears to be received by a >>>> node, but the object maintains it’s original value. >>>> >>>> Any help you can provide to debug this would be greatly appreciated. thank >>>> you! >>> >>> Ok, that changes things a lot. You're running with allow_mult=false, so >>> Riak will automatically resolve siblings for you if you create them. Are >>> you doing 'get before put' for your updates? That is, doing the PUT with >>> the vclock of the old value, or are you doing 'new' puts with a blank >>> vector clock? >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
