To add what Eric said: I don’t know Titan, but the phrase “atomic edge operations” suggests they require properties from the datastore that Riak’s eventually consistent datatypes can’t satisfy.
All that said, we have been asked by a customer to look at integration with Titan, and when time permits, we will. Cheers Russell On 16 Nov 2013, at 06:58, Eric Redmond <[email protected]> wrote: > The new sets aren't sorted, they're just proper sets. > > Riak isn't fundamentally changing from a key value store, the values of the > new data types are just convergent. So you still retrieve the whole value at > a time, no partial values (eg. subsets). > > Eric > > > On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:39 PM, bernie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> there was a thread on the Google's Titan group about using Riak with Titan. >> Matthias (one of the lead developers) initial response was that Riak's data >> model was difficult to work with for their use case. >> When I asked him about the new 2.0 data types he answered the following >> >> "Sets seem close to what we need. At least that will allow us to do atomic >> edge operations. Is it possible to specify a sort order on those sets and >> retrieve subsets or can I only retrieve the set as a whole?" >> >> Since I could not find the information, I am hoping somebody here will be >> able to help out. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Bernie >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/aureliusgraphs/sP0uS6A47IA >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
