Ok, so the path from 1.4 to 2.0 will be easier than that from 2.0pre to 2.0; and this means that it's better to stay with 1.4 for now.... Many thanks! Bye
MC Il 15/feb/2014 19:09 "John Daily" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > I strongly recommend sticking with the 1.4 series until 2.0 is formally > released. > > The 2.0 features are great, but making certain that upgrades will go > smoothly is a top priority for every major release of Riak, and this will > be no exception. You can upgrade when the time is right for your needs. > (And I don't want to speak for the engineering team, but I'd wager that no > one is placing a great deal of emphasis on testing upgrades from 2.0 > pre-releases to 2.0 itself.) > > With regard to the Python client: it does not yet support 2.0 features, > but that should change soon. It's under active development. > > -John > > On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Massimiliano Ciancio < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've a big question... if you have to go in production in the next two > > months (about at the half/end of April) you use Riak 1.4 or 2.0 pre-x > > ??? > > How hard will it be to upgrade from 1.4 to 2.0? > > At the moment I don't need new features (crdt) of 2.0 version. Maybe > > only new simpler configuration will be useful. > > More important: I'm using the python client: does it work with 2.0? > > Thanks > > Massimiliano > > > > _______________________________________________ > > riak-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
