Hi Luke

Is it safe to allow clients to connect directly to Riak CS as your suggestion is kinda against official docs (http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/configuration/Load-Balancing-and-Proxy-Configuration/)?

I also think our problem might be caused by ring_creation_size 256 while we have only 8 nodes up currently (the cluster is planned to grow twice in the future). Yes I am Stanislav's colleague :)

pb_backlog is set to 512 at the moment. Are you suggesting to lower it?
3 Apr 2014 20:18
Hi Stanislav,

Could you configure your clients to connect directly to Riak CS instead of through your proxy? A colleague of mine suggested that the {error,closed} and 104 error code in s3cmd appear to be caused by the connection between the client and Riak CS being closed or terminated unexpectedly.

I would still recommend keeping {pb_backlog, 256} as that will allow for more simultaneous connections to be handled going forward.

--
Luke Bakken
CSE
[email protected]



_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

--
Best regards
Anton Khalikov
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to