Stanchion is only used for user modification and creating/deleting buckets. The 
cluster will function just fine without it except for those functions.  


> On Jun 30, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Alex De la rosa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jared,
> 
> Thanks for your explanation and links... my next question is... Is Stanchion 
> not a single-point of failure? One of the things I like in Standard Riak is 
> that every node has the same level, there are no masters, no slaves... if one 
> fail it doesn't matter, the rest can do the job. If Riak CS requires un 
> especial node, what happens if that one fails? system is down then? Can you 
> configure the system with more than one Stanchion node?
> 
> Cheers,
> Alex
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jared Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Alex,
>> 
>> That is correct.  There are some additional docs we have on load-balancing 
>> and such on our docs page 
>> http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/configuration/Load-Balancing-and-Proxy-Configuration/,
>>  but generally it acts and feels like a Riak installation.  One additional 
>> special node is required (Stanchion) and that is also described on our docs 
>> page 
>> http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/configuration/Configuring-Stanchion/.
>> 
>> Keep the questions coming, if I don't know the details I'll hand off to 
>> Engineers more knowledgable with RiakCS.
>> 
>> -Jared
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Alex De la rosa <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>> 
>>> One more question regarding Riak CS, does it behave like standard Riak? 
>>> storing 3 copies (default) and needing a minimum of 5 servers to operate?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Jared Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Luwak is definitely EOL'd and RiakCS is our large object store going 
>>>> forward.  It is a far superior design compared to Luwak and handles very 
>>>> large file sizes. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thursday, June 26, 2014, Jason Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Riak CS is designed to be the same interface as Amazon S3.  It can be run 
>>>>> anywhere you can run Riak.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Think of it as a way to run your own S3.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think the hard limit on Riak objects is 50MB, but the recommended size 
>>>>> is less than 1MB per object.  The main reason for that is latency.  It's 
>>>>> faster to get 100x1MB chunks from the entire cluster than it is to get 
>>>>> 1x100MB chunk from a single server.  It's also easier for disks to pull a 
>>>>> 1MB object without delaying any other requests than pulling a 100MB 
>>>>> object, which may end up queuing other requests made after.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There used to be a project called luwak that was built into Riak and 
>>>>> handled chunking files like this, but it has been EOL'd.  Perhaps someone 
>>>>> can shed some light on this.  Is RiakCS the final solution for binary 
>>>>> storage?  Or is there another way to store larger objects in Riak?
>>>>> 
>>>>> RiakCS is wonderful, but it does seem overkill for some uses where you 
>>>>> don't need to expose an S3 interface, don't need the S3 permission 
>>>>> structure, and really just want file storage.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Alex De la rosa" <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "Hector Castro" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Cc: "riak-users" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 27 June, 2014 6:55:13 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Riak for streaming video
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Hector,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for your response :) highly appreciated. I have more questions 
>>>>> though.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Riak CS has to be implemented in Amazon S3? Or can I house it myself with 
>>>>> own managed servers?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is the limit for an object in Standard Riak? Large objects should go 
>>>>> to Riak CS, but what would be a limit for the Standard Riak? I may want 
>>>>> to save pictures, for example, in binary data... not a RAW version, but 
>>>>> like processed photo uploads from users... I think Standard Riak can hold 
>>>>> that with no problem, but it would be good to know the size limit for a 
>>>>> key's content.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alex
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Hector Castro < [email protected] > 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey Alex,
>>>>> 
>>>>> My response are inline below.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hector
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Alex De la rosa
>>>>> < [email protected] > wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Hector,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I see, I always thought that Riak CS was the same as Riak just that you 
>>>>> > run
>>>>> > it in Amazon S3... they are actually different...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Correct, but it is important to note that Riak is still at the core of 
>>>>> Riak CS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> > So... if I have a social network and one of the features is that they 
>>>>> > can
>>>>> > share video, I would use a normal Riak cluster for the webapp and data 
>>>>> > and a
>>>>> > Riak CS cluster for the video storage/streaming... am I right?
>>>>> 
>>>>> That seems like a reasonable conclusion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Riak is fundamentally a distributed key/value store for low latency
>>>>> access to smaller pieces of data. Riak CS is an S3/Swift
>>>>> API-compatible object storage platform with a little higher request
>>>>> latency, but also the added ability to house very large objects
>>>>> (backups, raw images, video).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> > By the way, couldn't this "range header" be implemented in standard 
>>>>> > Riak?
>>>>> > might be a good thing to have so you don't need 2 clusters for this 
>>>>> > matter.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It could some day. Right now, separating the clusters is best because
>>>>> tuning a single cluster for both use cases would be difficult.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Alex
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Hector Castro < [email protected] > 
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Hi Alex,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> For this type of problem, you may want to look into Riak CS. [0] It is
>>>>> >> an object storage platform built on top of Riak.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> When you GET an object from Riak CS, you can specify a Range header to
>>>>> >> get the object by its byte offset. [1]
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Hector
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> [0] http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/
>>>>> >> [1]
>>>>> >> http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/references/apis/storage/s3/RiakCS-GET-Object/#Examples
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Alex De la rosa
>>>>> >> < [email protected] > wrote:
>>>>> >> > Hi there,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Imagine that I want to use Riak for a video service like Youtube and 
>>>>> >> > I
>>>>> >> > save
>>>>> >> > the video file in Riak... is there a way to stream the contents of 1
>>>>> >> > key? I
>>>>> >> > know we can stream keys... but what about its content?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > It would be pretty troublesome to have to wait for the full data to 
>>>>> >> > be
>>>>> >> > downloaded $bucket->get('myvideo') to be able to serve it... as they 
>>>>> >> > can
>>>>> >> > be
>>>>> >> > pretty big files.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Is there any recommendation to store/get big files like videos? or it
>>>>> >> > would
>>>>> >> > be better to use some other system than Riak for the job?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>> >> > Alex
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> > riak-users mailing list
>>>>> >> > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> riak-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> riak-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to