Ok, what does `riak-admin status | grep riak_kv_version` return? The config files are different for Riak 1.x and 2.x.
Also for your tests, are you using any "coverage query" features like MapReduce or 2i queries? Thanks, Alex On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Chathuri Gunawardhana < lanch.gunawardh...@gmail.com> wrote: > For my experiment I will be using 100 nodes. > > Thank you! > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Alex Moore <amo...@basho.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chathuri, >> >> Larger ring sizes are not usually recommended, you can overload disk I/O >> if the number of vnodes to nodes is too high. >> Similarly you can underload other system resources if the vnode/node >> ratio is too low. >> >> How many nodes are you planning on running? >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Chathuri Gunawardhana < >> lanch.gunawardh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It is not possible to increase the number of partitions above 1024 and >>> has been disabled via cuttlefish in riak.config. When I try to increase >>> ring_size via riak.config, the error suggest that I should configure >>> partition size>1024 via advanced config file. But I couldn't find a way of >>> how I can specify this in advanced.config file. Can you please suggest me >>> how I can do this? >>> >>> Thank you very much! >>> >>> -- >>> Chathuri Gunawardhana >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Chathuri Gunawardhana > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
