On 18 Jan 2017, at 03:07, Andy leu <[email protected]> wrote: > thank you guys, that helps a lot. > one more question, do you think solr is a better solution than seconary > indexes?
It depends on your use case. There are Riak users who have great success with secondary indexes for their use case, for others solr makes more sense. I personally disagree with the statement at the top of http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.0/developing/usage/secondary-indexes/ Cheers Russell > > andrew > > From: Russell Brown <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:45:34 PM > To: Andy leu > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: secondary indexes > > Hi, > Riak's secondary indexes require a sorted backend, either of the memory or > leveldb backends will work, bitcask does not support secondary indexes. > > More details here > http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.0/developing/usage/secondary-indexes/ > > Cheers > > Russell > > On Jan 17, 2017, at 07:13 AM, Andy leu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hi: >> I ran the code as shown in >> http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.0/developing/getting-started/python/querying/. >> when I tried the lines about secondary index ： >> >> october_orders = order_bucket.get_index("order_date_bin" >> , >> >> "2013-10-01", "2013-10-31" >> ) >> october_orders.results >> >> >> an exception was raised: >> >> riak.riak_error.RiakError: >> '{error,{indexes_not_supported,riak_kv_bitcask_backend}}' >> >> >> can anyone tell me why and how to fix it? >> Thanks >> >> Andrew >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
