I dont believe abandon is the proper term, resurrect and carry forth, we will not let you go quietly into the night
LETS DO THIS SHIT! Ive got cloud resources I own... servers/VMS/XEN Ill do it myself if I need tooo. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Abandon hope all ye who enter here. > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Tom Santero <tsant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> RICON: A New Hope >> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@mac.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> We have talked about it. Let's do it! >>> >>> On Jul 13, 2017 7:56 PM, ll...@writersglen.com wrote: >>> >>> Hmmm--- I wonder if anyone has given thought to a conference focused on >>> the future of open-source Riak? >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm sure there are many good ideas out there re: roadmap and governance. >>> >>> >>> >>> It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action. >>> >>> >>> >>> All the best, >>> >>> >>> >>> LRP >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Russell Brown" <russell.br...@icloud.com> >>> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:40pm >>> To: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti" <sendto...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: "riak-users" <riak-users@lists.basho.com> >>> Subject: Re: Is Riak dead? >>> >>> Hi Senthilkumar, >>> No Riak is not dead. It’s parent company, Basho is dead. And they kept the >>> keys. There are numerous forks that are being worked on. Hopefully something >>> that is a canonical, community backed fork will emerge. Past mailing list >>> posts show strong support from large commercial and govt. organisations. >>> Riak is open source and will continue to be critical infrastructure for >>> numerous organisation in its niche for some time. >>> >>> There are also a few support organisations springing up, as well as the >>> existing partners (Erlang Solutions, Trifork etc.) If you’re asking me, this >>> could be a very good thing for Riak in the medium to long term. It and it’s >>> users and community were served very badly by Basho these last couple of >>> years. It’s a little trodden under, but no way dead. Give it a little time >>> to bounce back. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Russell >>> >>> >>> On 11 Jul 2017, at 08:15, Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti >>> <sendto...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Is Riak dead? No new activities on Riak GitHub repo. >>> > >>> > https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/pulse/monthly >>> > https://github.com/basho/riak/pulse/monthly >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Senthil >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > riak-users mailing list >>> > riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
