[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-10712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12586871#comment-12586871
]
Ilya Shaikovsky commented on RF-10712:
--------------------------------------
could agree except dataScroll (not against but just not completelly
understand). so just the question - do we want to do such refactoring after CR?
> processUpload vs. processFileUpload - naming conventions
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RF-10712
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-10712
> Project: RichFaces
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: compatibility
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0.CR1
> Environment: richfaces 4.0.X branch
> Reporter: Martin Kočí
> Assignee: Ilya Shaikovsky
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Final
>
>
> method org.richfaces.event.FileUploadListener.processUpload(FileUploadEvent)
> should be
> FileUploadListener.processFileUpload - with the "File" word in the middle.
> The unspecified JSF convention is:
> * logical name ("FileUpload")
> * listener: logical name + "Listener" ("FileUploadListener")
> * event: logical name + "Event" ("FileUploadEvent")
> * method "process" + logical name ("processFileUpload")
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues
