[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12758467#comment-12758467
]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on RF-12809:
----------------------------------------------
Marek Novotny <mnovo...@redhat.com> made a comment on [bug
915767|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915767]
the same approach with jboss-javaee-6.0-with-richfaces should be used in
Snowdrop Sportsclub example too.
> Richfaces-related examples should use -with-richfaces BOM
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RF-12809
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12809
> Project: RichFaces
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: examples
> Reporter: Tomas Repel
> Fix For: 4.2.4, 5.0.0.M2
>
>
> There is jboss-javaee-6.0-with-richfaces BOM, I think this should be used
> instead of richfaces-bom in case that jboss-javaee-6.0 BOM is required as
> well. This holds for helloworld-rf, kitchensink-rf and richfaces-validation.
> In case of helloworld-rf it is sufficient the dependencyManagement section to
> contain only -with-richfaces BOM, the jboss-javaee-6.0 BOM can be removed
> completely.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
richfaces-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues
