[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12807139#comment-12807139
]
Juraj Húska commented on RF-12802:
----------------------------------
Couple of questions which arose during refactoring, and we would like to know
your opinion on that:
# Do we want methods to throw exceptions when certain condition is not met, or
we want them to be no operation in such situations. Consider e.g.:
{code}
public void hide() {
if (!getMenuPopupInternal().isDisplayed()) {
throw new IllegalStateException("You are attemting to hide the " +
getNameOfFragment() + ", however, no "
+ getNameOfFragment() + " is displayed at the moment!");
}
browser.findElement(Utils.BY_HTML).click();
waitUntilIsNotVisible().perform();
}
{code}
Which throws exception when an user is attempting to hide already hidden popup
panel.
# Do we want to have {{AdvancedInteractions advanced()}} method in the API ?
For some Page Fragments, not doing so, means breaking program to interface rule.
E.g. using {{TextInputComponentImpl}} in {{RichFacesAutocomplete}}
[here|https://github.com/richfaces/richfaces-qa/blob/master/page-fragments/src/main/java/org/richfaces/tests/page/fragments/impl/autocomplete/RichFacesAutocomplete.java#L108].
In order to allow user to call {{advanced}} on the returned object, we have to
return concrete implementation, not the interface. Is that OK for that
component ?
I would not add {{advanced}} to API, because not all implementation (not our,
but possible future implementations) needs such method.
> Move page fragments from repository qa to richfaces5
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RF-12802
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-12802
> Project: RichFaces
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: build/distribution
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0.Alpha1
> Reporter: Pavol Pitonak
> Assignee: Brian Leathem
> Fix For: 5.0.0.Alpha2
>
>
> As discussed on community meeting on Feb 12, we should move page fragments
> for RichFaces components to richfaces5 repository so that they are
> distributed with framework.
> We should find out how to prepare them so that they are easy to use for
> community members. RichFaces QE/dev need to test internals of components,
> community members will probably test only high-level functionality of
> components. One possible solution would be to create package "internal" in
> which there would be page fragments extending those from "public" package. QE
> team would then use "internal" implementations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
richfaces-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-issues
