A Short History of the Tea Parties
 
National Review Online 
To: [email protected] 
 
A Short History of the Tea Parties

Yesterday's D.C. meeting was spurred by a foreign lawmaker who wanted to get a 
sense of how the Tea Parties came about (with, I suspect, an interest in 
facilitating a similar movement in his home country). What follows is the gist 
of what I told him, from an unfinished article idea:
The modern incarnation of the Tea Parties is a spectacularly sober movement, 
inspired by animating spirits that seemed dormant for the better part of a 
generation.
For decades, conservatives watched large rallies in Washington for gay rights, 
opposition to Middle Eastern wars, the Million Man March, gun control, and 
dozens of other trendy lefty causes, and consoled themselves with the idea that 
the grassroots of the Right just weren't the kind of folks who attended big 
rallies. (Pro-lifers, with their annual March for Life held in bitter January 
weather, made a striking exception.) Unions often secure the day off for their 
members; college students and professors find it all too easy to skip or cancel 
class. If you didn't see the demographics that make up the GOP base -- small 
businessmen, parents, members of the military -- marching and waving signs, 
it's because they were too busy working for a living.
The libertarian magazine Reason has noted that Americans who subscribe to a 
socially liberal, fiscally conservative philosophy are the ideological 
demographic most likely to own jacuzzis and hot tubs. Couple this with a 
preference for individualism over broad-based group action, and one can quickly 
understand why you don't often see giant libertarian rallies: They're mostly at 
home having fun in their hot tubs. In fact, it takes a dire threat to their 
liberties to get them out of their hot tubs.
Enter the Obama administration.
Like most successes, at least a thousand figures are claiming fatherhood of the 
Tea Party phenomenon, but certainly a key moment came Feb. 19, 2009, from an 
unlikely source: CNBC correspondent Rick Santelli, who launched into an 
off-the-cuff rant when asked to evaluate the initial moves from the Obama 
administration to deal with a housing market that had plummeted. "The 
government is promoting bad behavior!" Santelli shouted, accusing the 
administration of a plan that amounted to "subsidizing the losers' mortgages."
 "This is America!" Santelli shouted. "How many of you people want to pay for 
your neighbors' mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can't pay their bills? 
. . . President Obama, are you listening?"
He articulated the concern that drove welfare reform, the most significant 
policy achievement of Bill Clinton's presidency: Government was taking from the 
responsible in order to save the irresponsible from the consequences of their 
own bad decisions. Americans are a charitable people, but they quickly anger 
when they suspect they're being played for a sucker.
The first national "Tea Party" day, held April 16, 2009, ran into the usual 
trouble; if you're trying to rally big crowds of squeezed and harried 
taxpayers, it's probably a mistake to hold the rally the day that federal taxes 
are due. But a Tea Party skeptic, liberal blogger Nate Silver, went through 
accounts of crowds from Denver (5,000) to Bound Brook, New Jersey (20) and came 
up with a minimum number of estimated attendees nationwide: 111,899, a number 
he granted was "reasonably impressive."
Listen to a discussion of the debt and deficit at a Tea Party meeting, and you 
won't hear a lot of numbers; instead, it is articulated as a moral issue, and a 
national moral failure. The spending spree of TARP and the stimulus -- and a 
deficit exacerbated by plummeting tax revenues -- is spurring Americans to look 
at the debt as a great horror inflicted upon their children and grandchildren. 
Occasionally, you'll hear a bit of denunciation of the Chinese holding American 
debt, but by and large this is seen as an American failure to practice thrift, 
impulse control, and responsibility -- or more specifically, American 
lawmakers' failure to do so.
It's fairly standard for a conservative lawmaker to encounter angry liberal 
crowds. But during the summer of 2009, as Congress took up a massive 
health-care bill after passing massive spending bills, Democrat lawmakers 
returned to their districts to find huge angry crowds turning out at their 
public meetings. Democrats had never seen anything like it: overflow crowds, 
angry chants, and in one case, a lawmaker hung in effigy. Inside-the-Beltway 
veterans like David Broder of the Washington Post predicted a backlash, but 
none arrived. Americans concluded if you want to enjoy the relatively pampered 
life of a congressman, you had better be ready to listen to a constituent tell 
you why you're doing such a lousy job. Democrats largely responded to the 
challenge by refusing to hold additional public meetings. 
Coverage of the Tea Parties mostly focused on the inevitable odd character who 
dressed up in Revolutionary garb, or signs misspelled, or worse. Gather a large 
enough crowd, and some yahoo will express their opposition to the president in 
a distasteful or racist manner. Much more ubiquitous was the Gadsden flag, one 
of the first flags of the United States, which depicts a rattlesnake coiled and 
ready to strike with the legend "Don't Tread on Me."
While the Tea Parties were being mocked, dismissed, and demonized, the ill 
omens for Obama piled up to an almost comical level: Republicans won two big 
governor's races in 2009; Scott Brown, a Republican, won the Senate seat of the 
late Ted Kennedy; higher turnout in Republican primaries through 2010, for the 
first time in 80 years; the Gallup poll showing the largest enthusiasm gap 
between the parties they had ever recorded.
Their impact is decisive, but not overwhelming. Democrats hung on in a few key 
Senate and governor's races, and a few traditional Democratic strongholds 
resisted the Republican wave. But even President Obama called the results "a 
shellacking."
 "The impact of the Tea Party movement cannot be understated. The energy 
harnessed by the movement helped mobilize Americans to support Republican 
candidates, and more importantly go to the polls to vote against the 
higher-tax, big-government, anti-business Obama agenda," said a Washington 
Republican helping coordinate strategy for the lower house of Congress. "Their 
energy and support helped push the number of competitive races from the usual 
30 or 40 to well past 100 and turned a wave election into a tsunami." 
As Obama stumbles, liberals are beginning to realize that he is the last hope 
for their movement; they will not elect a more progressive, more popular, more 
charismatic president by a wider margin anytime soon, and they will never enjoy 
a more perfect political environment than they did in autumn 2008. By contrast, 
the Tea Parties are asymmetrical warfare applied to the political realm. Sarah 
Palin, Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann, and Senators Marco Rubio of Florida 
and Rand Paul of Kentucky are all key figures in the Tea Party movement, but 
none are irreplaceable. Unlike most powerful organizations in Washington, there 
is no one main phone number for the Tea Parties, an incomprehensible 
development to many Washington reporters. There are quite a few groups claiming 
to speak for the Tea Party movement -- FreedomWorks, the Tea Party Patriots, 
the Tea Party Express -- but in the end they're simply event organizers rather 
than directors. The whole point
 of this movement is that these people hate being told what to do.
Unlike the usual angry crowds of striking workers in France or pensioners in 
Greece, the Tea Party is the strange phenomenon of citizens demanding 
government spend less instead of more. For all of our flaws, Americans are 
waking up to the hard fact that when their government spends, they end up 
paying every cent, sooner or later


Note: All hate speech has been removed from the above text.

Is the Constitution the Supreme Law of the Land or not?  
  
I GUESS THE SCOTUS HAS ANWERED THAT QUESTION 
  
Is violence the last resort, or does surrender precede it? 



  
Who is George Soros 
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14700  
  
  
How does Obama expect to get re-elected? 
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=255965 
  
If a link above does not work, cut-and-paste to your browser. 




Please be aware that Barack Hussein Obama’s grandfather was a highly respected 
witch doctor with the Luo tribe. His white grandmother was VP at the Bank of 
Hawaii and she worked with and for Peter Geithner on other projects, Peter is 
the father of Timothy Geithner, Obama's choice of Treasurer of  the US.



  




We the People
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE
   









This email is archived at 
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en 

I'M MAD, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE
 
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bprelutsky/2009/07/05/im-mad-as-hell/




 
.
  



      

-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en

Reply via email to