Demeaned, fondled and demeaned 
  
  
  
  
Baby bomb threat: Outrage as toddler is given full frisking by TSA agents
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385207/Baby-bomb-threat-Outrage-toddler-given-frisking-TSA-agents.html#ixzz1M1HIva00
 
  
  

Beauty queen blasts TSA over pat-down (vid)
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42877532/ns/today-todaytravel/t/beauty-queen-blasts-tsa-over-pat-down/
 

and 
http://www.eagletribune.com/local/x340280196/Methuen-native-Miss-USA-Susie-Castillo-enters-fray-over-airport-screening
 
  
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and 
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and 
no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or 
affirmation*, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the 
persons or things to be seized. 
The 4th, IMHO, begins to get murky, even back then. What does “effects” include 
in the first clause? What is “unreasonable? Do effects cover telegrams, phone & 
internet service? What about offices, backyard sheds and warehouses? Are they 
exempt? And what is “unreasonable”?  What happens when the govt violates these 
rights? See what I mean. Murky wiggle room. The 2nd half isn’t much better: 
before govt can search it must show probable cause, be supported by oath or 
affirmation and describe the place and person(s) to be searched or seized. What 
if a legal search discovers other illegal activity. What if the illegal 
activity was discovered but search was found to by “unreasonable” after the 
fact? 
  
* The legal definition of affirmation is: A solemn declaration made under the 
penalties of perjury, by persons who conscientiously decline taking an oath; 
which affirmation is in law equivalent to testimony given under oath.  Noah 
Webster's 1828 American Dictionary) 
A solemn and formal declaration or asseveration that an affidavit is true, that 
the witness will tell the truth, etc.; this being substituted for an oath in 
certain cases.  A solemn religious asseveration in the nature of an oath.  
Blacks' Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition 
  
We know that in Marbury,vs Madison ,  the Supreme Court took it upon itself to 
answer some of these problems. For instance, if a search is illegal, everything 
discovered as a result of that violation of the 4th, cannot be presented in a 
court of law. The violator of the Supreme Law of the Land and the target of the 
warrant cancel each other out. Huh? Since when do two wrongs make a right? No 
harm no foul? This ain’t the NBA. What they did was compound the problem. They 
exonerated 2 perps so as not of prosecute one of their own. Seems to me both 
law breakers should be punished for their crimes, donchya think?


  
  
Contact Your Govt 
http://www.usa.gov/Contact.shtml 
  

Is the Constitution the Supreme Law of the Land or not?  
  
I GUESS THE SCOTUS HAS ANSWERED THAT QUESTION 



   
Patriot Freedom
http://www.patriotfreedom.org/battlefield.php 
  
If a link above does not work, cut-and-paste to your browser. 




Please be aware that Barack Hussein Obama’s grandfather was a highly respected 
witch doctor with the Luo tribe. His white grandmother was VP at the Bank of 
Hawaii and she worked with and for Peter Geithner on other projects, Peter is 
the father of Timothy Geithner, Obama's choice of Treasurer of  the US.



  






We the People
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE
   









This email is archived at 
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en 

I'M MAD, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE
 
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bprelutsky/2009/07/05/im-mad-as-hell/




 
.
  

-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en

Reply via email to