Sarah Palin to announce in June 





  
  
I like Herman Cain, but he has no political experience. That’s why I voted for 
Ross Perot---twice. 
  
I like Michele Bachmann, a human dynamo, but to the best of my knowledge, she 
has no executive experience. If selected, I would give her my vote and pray she 
got the best of advisors. 
  
I like Sarah Palin , high negatives and all. The Soros controlled media gave 
her a very rough time; and, they are better prepared for her this go around. On 
the other hand she’s proven able to take everything thrown at her, and come 
back swinging. 
  
I still like Mr Newt. The Obama media hit him quick and hard. They must really 
fear him. They scraped up a 1993 comment. Yes, 1993, before he became Speaker. 
And now they try to make something out of a $500K jewelry bill. Who cares as 
long as he doesn’t abuse his political status to settle the debt? Mr Newt is 
the guy who did everything the media gave credit to Clinton for in his 2nd 
term, including balancing the budget. Compare that to their non-germain 
accusations. He is a true conservative that has a track record of getting 
the job done, not the RINO they are making him out to be. 
  
To the best of my knowledge, all 4 are genuine conservatives. 
  
The only question is: after 20 more months of  Presidential terrorism, will 
there be anything left worth saving? 
  
  
http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/clarity-and-sarah-palin 
  
I don’t know how you can come to any other conclusion other than Sarah Plain 
will announce she is running 
  
Correction:
I was mistaken when I wrote that not raising the debt ceiling would result in 
an instant-balanced-budget. I failed to take into consideration that the outlaw 
govt might not let itself be stopped by an obsolete law or two. Unable to print 
money, they borrowed/stole from the fedl pension fund. Actually, stole is too 
strong of word since it must be repaid by law. Of course, repayment requires a 
lawful White House. 
  
Since the govt is obligated to replenish the fund they “tapped”, by law, it 
wasn’t stolen, just borrowed. That being the case. the USG is in violation of 
the debt ceiling, “accounting tricks” be damned. They’ve already ran up all the 
debt they were authorized and borrowed some more. 
  
I apologize for my lapse in assuming the Administration spending spree could be 
cut short by a simple law. 
  
Have you noticed that no political figure from either party has done anything 
more than call it an “accounting trick”? 
  
Does anyone know if the military is being paid in full again? If not, 
that’s could be more unauthorized debt. 
 


 


 
I'M MAD, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE.


http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en


 Rich Martin 
 
.

-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en

Reply via email to