PUTTING SOME DOTS TOGETHER: Brutality codified by USCG This is NOT happening in a vacuum. Nor is it co-incidental. We’ve all seen a lot citizens being treated like cattle by the political class in charge. The arrogance of their enforcers is obvious. Adam Kokesh body slammed, choked, police brutality at Jefferson Memorial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jUU3yCy3uI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PDhjNF9eUQ Don’t know if Washington , DC , has re-instituted the 1st Amendment since these vids were shown, or if it’s still banned. The above are samples of the police brutality upon non-resisting citizens. Many many more examples on the Internet. Search for jeffersonmemorial dancers on your favorite search engine. 1st AND 4th Amendment be damned Neighbor protesting police tactics gets arrested http://www.infowars.com/man-arrested-for-filming-police-from-own-yard/ The UTUBE that was taken down in above link http://judicial-corruption.net/2011/07/man-arrested-for-filming-police-from-his-own-garage/ Cops no longer need a warrant or follow due process to enter a home. http://commonsensealternatives.com/high-court-rules-illegal-cop-entry-into-home-ok-with-them-you-have-no-right-to-resist/ To the best of my knowledge, none of these perps were charged with brutality or any other criminal act observed above. If it’s that bad in the nations Capitol imagine what they can do in the hinterlands. Now I know in the big pic this may not seem like much. Certainly it’s not like someone screaming fire in a darkened theater. They were testing the right to free speech and Thos. Jefferson lost. Search for Police attack camera man on your favorite search engine. These storm trooper techniques are new to America , at least they have increased greatly in the last couple of years Here’s one of the reasons taxes can’t keep up with Obama’s spending
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF5s_AeoP-4 Search for Obama’s private Army, 6,000 strong, on your favorite search engine. Let’s not forget the TSA gropers (in training for exhilarating experiences yet to come) http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/travel/judge-mulls-request-to-dismiss-va-airport-protesters-lawsuit-stripped-to-object-to-screening/2011/08/10/gIQAfl546I_story.html Trains http://www.prisonplanet.com/tsa-lies-to-justify-illegal-train-station-grope-down.html and everything else http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/tsa-swarms-8000-bus-stations-public-transit-systems-yearly Maybe you’re not yet convinced that a big police/military force is being built to control the civilian population of the USA. s o you don't worry. Seems to me they are pretty non-discriminatory in who they search. They’ve gone after babies, preteens, breast-feeding mothers, Jesse Ventura and the elderly. The only exceptions seem to be Federal elected officials and Muslims, but everyone else has been stripped or their 4th Amendment protection. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation*, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The 4th, IMHO, begins to get murky, even back then. What does “effects” include in the first clause? What is “unreasonable? Do effects cover telegrams, phone & internet service? What about offices, backyard sheds and warehouses? Are they exempt? And what is “unreasonable”? What happens when the govt violates these rights? See what I mean. Murky wiggle room. The 2nd half isn’t much better: before govt can search it must show probable cause, be supported by oath or affirmation and describe the place and person(s) to be searched or seized. What if a legal search discovers other illegal activity. What if the illegal activity was discovered but search was found to by “unreasonable” after the fact? * The legal definition of affirmation is: A solemn declaration made under the penalties of perjury, by persons who conscientiously decline taking an oath; which affirmation is in law equivalent to testimony given under oath. Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary) A solemn and formal declaration or asseveration that an affidavit is true, that the witness will tell the truth, etc.; this being substituted for an oath in certain cases. A solemn religious asseveration in the nature of an oath. Blacks' Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition We know that in Marbury,vs Madison , the Supreme Court took it upon itself to answer some of these problems. For instance, if a search is illegal, everything discovered as a result of that violation of the 4th, cannot be presented in a court of law. The violator of the Supreme Law of the Land and the target of the warrant cancel each other out. Huh? Since when do two wrongs make a right? No harm no foul? This ain’t the NBA. What they did was compound the problem. They exonerated 2 perps so as not of prosecute one of their own. Seems to me both law breakers should be punished for their crimes, donchya think? We the People http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE -- To join RichsRants, send email to: [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
