Interesting Items by Alex Gimarc – July 2





  
  
Come visit us at our new web site: 
www.interestingitems.org 
Leave your thoughts, comments and opinions. 
We look forward to hearing from 
you.                                                                         
  
  
Interesting Items
Alex Gimarc 
[email protected] 
  
  
Interesting Items 7/2 
  
In this issue:  
  
1.  ObamaCare 
2.  Contempt 
3.  EPA 
4.  Arizona 
  
1.  ObamaCare.  In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court found the individual 
mandate in ObamaCare, the heart of the legislation, unconstitutional under the 
commerce clause as a penalty. 

Unfortunately, Chief Justice Roberts decided that it was constitutional if you 
call it a tax – which nobody in the entire process called it other than the 
Chief Justice.  By a 7-2 majority, it also found the Medicare expansion was 
unenforceable, and that the states could opt out without putting all federal 
Medicare dollars into individual states at risk.  

Leaks from inside the SCOTUS indicated that Roberts originally voted to toss 
out the entire act as unconstitutional.  Sometime during the process, he 
changed his vote and found a way to uphold it (finding the individual mandate 
as a tax) and wrote what was described as a convoluted and lame defense of it.  

Conservatives are all over the place about Roberts’ straying from conservative 
principles with his opinion.  A large number are simply aghast at what he did, 
and are blasting away at him with impunity.  These include Limbaugh, Levin, 
Sowell and Jack Wheeler.  Another large contingent are busily shoveling their 
way through the pile of manure that is the majority opinion (which Roberts also 
wrote), trying to find the pony.  This includes what I would call a majority of 
blogging conservative lawyers including Randy Barnett, Patterico and the 
PowerLine bloggers. 
  
 A bunch of us are scratching our heads trying figure out what happened and 
why.  There are those that believe that the Chicago mob got through to Roberts 
and “changed his mind” on ObamaCare.  Some believe that he caved in to public 
pressure from the media and the Obama administration.  Either of these would be 
very, very bad, as it would indicate that Chief Justice Roberts is no longer a 
reliable strict constructionist.  
  
There is also a third possibility that this is what Roberts really believes.  
Regardless, our path is clear.  It is up to We the People to elect people this 
November to overturn this monstrosity.  And now that the SCOTUS majority – all 
the liberals plus Roberts – has just voted to call it a tax, repeal can take 
place via budget reconciliation which takes only 51 votes in the Senate and 
cannot be filibustered.  
  
It is a crushing loss for individual liberty that this is not overturned, as it 
means that the SCOTUS cannot be trusted to protect our liberty and individual 
rights.  On the other hand, the Medicare expansion opinion can be a very useful 
tool for the states to protect their sovereignty against future acts of 
congress and the overreaching federal bureaucracy.  Over the last several 
decades, congress has levied unfunded mandate after unfunded mandate on the 
states.  The Medicare expansion is simply the latest example.  The carrot is a 
little more money to the states.  The stick is another dumptruck load of 
federal rules and regulations along with the money.  And if the states refuse 
to agree to take the money for the unfunded mandate, congress shuts off all 
money for that program.  The stick congress intended to use for the Medicare 
expansion was a threat to cut off all Medicare money to the states should they 
refuse to accept the expansion.  Past
 examples are threats to withhold all federal highway dollars should the states 
refuse to pass seat belt or helmet laws.  
  
Under this opinion, joined by the liberals, congress and the administration can 
no longer do this.  This opinion will drive this election, as every single one 
of 23 democrat and independent US Senators up for reelection voted for this.  
Pick up four new seats, and elect Mitt Romney president while holding on to the 
House of Representatives, and it all goes away.  Roberts tossed the entire mess 
back to the voters to solve, and solve it we will. 
  
2.  Contempt.  On Thursday, the House also voted to find Attorney General Eric 
Holder in contempt of congress for covering up and withholding documents on the 
Fast and Furious gun running scheme.  The vote was 255 – 67, with 17 democrats 
voting for the contempt resolution.  The Congressional Black Caucus led a 
walkout during the vote, which explains the small number voting in opposition.  
There were two votes, one for civil and the other for criminal contempt.  
Criminal contempt is handled by the (In)Justice Department (DOJ) itself, with 
the Federal Prosecutor for the District of Columbia doing the honors.  

DOJ immediately sent a letter to the House stating they would not be pursuing 
an investigation and prosecution.  This leaves civil contempt which the House 
itself can pursue in court.  Apparently the House also has the ability to 
arrest and jail Holder if they wish.  While I don’t expect that to happen, 
impeachment is certainly in Holder’s future.  Darrell Issa (R, CA) read secret 
wiretap applications into the congressional record on the floor of the House 
Friday.  These smoking guns demonstrate that Holder’s (In)Justice Department 
knew they had lost track of firearms purchased and allowed to enter Mexico in 
2010.  They also demonstrate that Holder has been lying because the wiretaps 
are approved by Holder’s office.  This is information that Holder’s department 
has been slow-rolling from congress for a couple of years in an attempt to keep 
the fecal matter from hitting the fan until after the election in November.  
Issa’s action in
 reading this into the congressional record protects him from prosecution for 
leaking classified.  As of this writing, Holder and his department are in deep 
serious trouble and they are reacting poorly by shooting messengers and 
whistleblowers that are providing information to congress. 
  
3.  EPA.  A federal district court in the District of Columbia ruled last week 
that the EPA was “unambiguously correct” ruling that vehicle and industrial 
emissions of carbon dioxide were a threat to public health.  This ruling bought 
the entirety of the EPA’s bogus finding that carbon dioxide is a pollutant and 
must be regulated for public safety.  The court rejected challenges to the EPA 
from states, industrial groups, electrical generation utilities and auto 
manufacturers.  It was a great win for the taxpayer funded frauds infesting 
Lisa Jackson’s EPA.  
  
The courts have become part of the problem, giving entirely too much latitude 
to the regulatory state.  The EPA’s carbon dioxide finding was based entirely 
on the fraudulent UN IPCC process, which has been demonstrated to be created 
out of thin air via e-mails and computer code released out of the University of 
East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit.  And as such, must be repealed.  Once 
again, it appears that it will be up to congress to do the deed – yet one more 
reason for all of us to get off the dime and get to work for the November 
election.  We have 120 days.  Time to get to work. 
  
4.  Arizona .  The SCOTUS earlier in the week gave the state of Arizona a 
pyrrhic victory in their fight over immigration with the Obama administration.  
The court found that Arizona could continue stopping people and checking on 
their immigration status.  They invalidated three of the ten remaining sections 
of the law which will not allow Arizona to enforce federal law if the WH 
refuses to do so.  

The State of Arizona was pretty pleased that the heart of the legislation was 
upheld, and will take steps to correct the portions that the court found 
unconstitutional.  

In response, the Obama administration within hours of the opinion being 
released ordered the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to stop all 
cooperation with Arizona, specifically ordering DHS to stop answering phone 
calls about whether someone stopped was legal or not.  This directive, this 
diktat from the Obama WH is punishment to Arizona for having the temerity to 
challenge them in court and win.  In essence, the Obama WH opened the southern 
border for all comers and they set up a civil rights hotline in the (In)Justice 
Department to handle calls for illegals who believe their civil rights are 
being violated when stopped.  

Arizona is considering their options.  And they do have options.  One would be 
to declare martial law along the border and call up the Arizona National Guard 
to patrol it.  If done, they should be armed with live ammunition and allowed 
to pursue into Mexico if necessary.  

Another would be for Arizona to get together with New Mexico and Texas and draw 
up a State Compact between the three states to handle the problem of illegal 
open borders.  They then submit it to congress for approval.  Note that I do 
not include California as the democrat and union led state would not agree that 
they have a problem.  If DHS is no longer interested in controlling illegal 
immigration, why do we continue to fund them?  Note that the Obama WH action 
has touched off a mini-revolt within Immigration and Naturalization Service 
officers who are really interested in doing their assigned mission.  This one 
is not yet over either. 
  
More later - 
  
- AG 
  
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better 
than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not 
your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your 
chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our 
countrymen." 
- Samuel Adams, speech at the Philadelphia 
  State House, August 1, 1776. 
  
Note: Interesting Items can be found at the following locations: 
Our Home Page http://interestingitems.org/ 
Archives can be found at  http://home.gci.net/~agimarc 
Anchorage Daily Planet http://www. anchoragedailyplanet.com/ 
MatSu Valley News http://matsuvalleynews. blogspot.com/ 
Subscriber and supporter Elbert Collins at http://thatselbert.wordpress. com/ 
Rod Martin's The Vanguard site is also a long-time supporter of this column: 
http://www.thevanguard.org/ 
  
  
  
  
Note: Interesting Items can be found at the following locations: 
Our Home Page http://interestingitems.org/ 
Archives can be found at  http://home.gci.net/~agimarc 
Anchorage Daily Planet http://www.anchoragedailyplanet.com/ 
MatSu Valley News http://matsuvalleynews.blogspot.com/ 
Subscriber and supporter Elbert Collins at http://thatselbert.wordpress.com/ 
Rod Martin's The Vanguard site is also a long-time supporter of this column: 
http://www.thevanguard.org/ 
  
  
Ray Stevens - Obama Budget Plan 
http://www.patriotactionnetwork.com/video/video/show?id=2600775:
Video:4018994&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_video 
  
  
  
  
“If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if 
you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come 
to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and 
only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may 
have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish 
than to live as slaves.”
Winston S. Churchill 
  
 

 

-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en

Reply via email to