REAL NEWS OBAMA'S MUSLIM CHILDHOOD UPBRINGING WON'T LET HIM DISRESPECT "TERROR ATTACKS". [email protected]
(Common sense, politically incorrect newsletter to 15,146 subscribers) Our mission is to get our readers thinking about current events. OBAMA'S MUSLIM CHILDHOOD UPBRINGING WON'T LET HIM DISRESPECT "TERROR ATTACKS". Obama Renamed Terror Attacks As "Man-Made Disasters" and Classified the Global War on Terror As “Overseas Contingency Operations.” Fort Hood High Fatality Terrorist Attack Renamed "Workplace Violence" So Victims Can't Receive Battlefield Injury Benefits. Dear Readers, I am absolutely devastated after reading the extensive details about our government coverup of the planned terrorist attack September 11th on our embassy in Benghazi , Lybia. What possible reason could our government administrators have to lie so much about what happened, refusing to provide security begged constantly by the small embassy staff, and our president conversing on a national TV talk show that the endangered embassy resulting in four deaths was not then considered important. The following column by Patrick Buchanan seems to sum up the administration's strategy. Since Osama bin Laden and many al-Qaida leaders were killed, President Obama claimed that we were winning the Muslim wars, so he needed to hide that our Muslim relations are fast deteriorating until after the election November 6th. I cried when I read this because it is so hard to believe such shameful people are now administering our formerly proud country. --REAL NEWS Editor [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Behind the Benghazi Cover-Up By Patrick J. Buchanan Creative Syndicate Columnist October 16, 2012 On Sept. 11, scores of men with automatic weapons and RPGs launched a night assault on the U.S. compound in Benghazi , killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and set the building ablaze. Using mortars, they launched a collateral attack on a safe house, killing two more Americans, as other U.S. agents fled to the airport. On Sept. 14, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the attack came out of a spontaneous protest caused by an anti-Muslim video on YouTube. On Sept. 16, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice told the entire nation the attack had not been premeditated or preplanned but emanated from a spontaneous protest of the nasty video. On Sept. 25, Obama at the United Nations mentioned the video six times. But when they were pushing this tale, what did the White House actually know? For we have now learned that the assault was observed in near real time by the State Department's Charlene Lamb, who was in contact with the security section at the Benghazi compound. The next day, Sept. 12, Fox News and Eli Lake of The Daily Beast reported that U.S. intelligence had concluded it was terrorism. Within 24 hours of the attack, U.S. intelligence had identified some of the terrorists as members of an al-Qaida affiliate. Thus either administration higher-ups were ignorant for more than a week of what their own agents knew, and are thus manifestly incompetent, or they colluded in a cover-up and orchestrated deception. As the facts are revealed, the weight of evidence tilts toward the latter conclusion. Why? Because we now know there never was any protest at the Benghazi compound -- not against an anti-Muslim video or anything else. And if there was no protest, who sent Carney out to blame the attack on the protest? And if there was no protest, who programmed Rice and put her on five separate Sunday talk shows to attribute the massacre to a protest that never happened? If real-time intelligence and U.S. agents at the scene knew it was premeditated, preplanned terrorism by Sept. 12, who told Rice to deny specifically on Sept. 16 that the attack was premeditated or preplanned? Indeed, why was Rice sent out at all? She is not in the chain of command. Why she accepted the assignment is obvious. She wants to be Hillary Clinton's successor as secretary of state. But who put her up to this? Who pushed her out front to mislead us? The CIA's David Petraeus or Director of National Intelligence James Clapper should have been sent out to say what we knew, five days after the massacre. As Chris Stevens reported to the secretary of state and President Obama, why was Hillary or National Security Adviser Tom Donilon not sent out to explain what had happened to Stevens and the others? Looking back, Carney and Rice appear to have been used by their superiors. Carney would never have gone out to speculate on his own about what happened in Benghazi . His line on Sept. 14 had to have been fed to him by the White House chief of staff, Donilon, Obama or all of them. As for Rice, someone contacted those five TV networks to put her on. And the party line she delivered -- the opposite of the truth -- had to have been fed to her, almost word for word -- by Donilon or the chief of staff. Could Donilon or Hillary have been in the dark about what Rice was going to say? Could they have still been in the dark about what had happened five days before in Benghazi , when Hillary's own deputy Charlene Lamb had followed the terrorist attack in near real time? Hillary and the entire Obama national security team are in that famous photo with Obama watching Seal Team Six in Abbottabad when Osama bin Laden was taken down. Was the National Security Council alerted by Lamb when she was observing the attack in near real time? Did the NSC also observe? Was the president told by the NSC that we were getting real-time intel and video from Benghazi, and would he like to see? There is an even more fundamental question: Why did the White House persist with the phony story of a protest against a video being the cause of Ambassador Stevens' death, when they had to know there was no protest? The most plausible explanation is that the truth -- we were being hit with the worst terror attack since 9/11 in a city we saved -- would have exposed Obama's boasting about his Libya triumph and al-Qaida being "on the run" and "on the path to defeat" as absurd propaganda. Al-Qaida is now in Libya, Mali, Yemen, Syria, Iraq and Pakistan . And the epidemic of anti-American riots across the Muslim world, with Arab Spring elections bringing to power Islamist regimes, testify to the real truth. After four years of Obama, it is America that is on the run in the Middle East . But we can't let folks find that out until after Nov. 6. Hence the Benghazi cover-up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- OBAMA HATES TO SAY "TERROR ATTACK" "The Obama administration is desperately trying to deny: that there is a jihadist ideology; that the primary meaning of the doctrine of jihad has always been warfare against non-Muslims; that the perpetrators of jihadist violence are not mere "criminals", they are enemy combatants who deserve to be treated as enemy combatants; and that their victims, such as at Ft. Hood and the Little Rock Recruitment Center , are not victims of "crime" or "workplace violence," but are victims of an act of war-jihad." The Obama administration has gone so far in acting on this denial that, at the insistence of radical Muslim organizations, it is expunging all references to "jihad" or "radical Islam" from FBI terrorism training manuals." So desperate is Obama to get us to believe he has saved the world from terrorism that he lied about Benghazi . -------------------------------------------------------------------- For free Politically Incorrect news ignored by the American news media, send your friends' email addresses for REAL NEWS from [email protected]. To cancel your free REAL NEWS, click "reply" and type "stop messages". -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For free Politically Incorrect news ignored by the American news media, send your friends' email addresses for REAL NEWS from [email protected] Join FreedomWorks Lower Taxes. Less Government. More Freedom http://www.freedomworks.org/ Do you remember the VEEP going berserk screaming during the VP debate that even if Iran gets the bomb, they haven’t got a vehicle to deliver it? I guess he hasn’t heard about the President’s Muslim outreach program giving them free rein at NASA. Rich Martin George Orwell: “In times of great deceit, speaking truth is a revolutionary act. I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q When replying to this message, plz cc: [email protected] to assure prompt reply. Mrs. Richard "Peggy" Martin (1935 - 2012) http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=margaret-irene-martin-peggy&pid=159081400&fhid=12241#fbLoggedOut http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/dfw/guestbook.aspx?n=margaret-martin&pid=159081400&sort=1 -- To join RichsRants, send email to: [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
