WE WAS ROBBED © 2012 Rich Martin Permission to repost in full, or in part, is granted. In other words, please feel free to forward to a friend or list. If you received this from a friend, you can subscribe by sending email to: [email protected] just check the archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rants/messages
>From the Home of Rich & Peggy Martin ______________________________________ "It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." Josef Stalin _________________________________ RICHS RANTS In support and continuation of the previous message. The model used by polsters to predict the election was heavily weighted in favor of Democrat turn out by 2-9 points. We all know that, but the actual votes counted for both candidates were less than the the 2008 tally. In Obama’s case, it makes sense: electing a black man for the first time was an historic event. Therefor the model was disproved. The model for Obama should have been 2008 minus 3 or 4 points, not plus. The prediction of a higher Obama turnout in 2012 was patently incorrect. As for the GOP candidates, in 2008 McCain generated no magic. His day in the sun was over. The polls showed a big Democrat victory discouraging Republicans. (Long time readers might remember that I took My Peggy to Branson and did we not vote for the only time in our married life.) This election the GOP was highly energized to undo the damage of the last 4 years, such as the failing economy, high unempolyment, the on going scandals of Solyndra, Fast & Furious and Benghazi (no thanks to the MSM). The passage of Obamacare with all its “tricks” and subterfuges cannot possibly be taken seriously by any measure. Attacks on Romney’s leadership as Gov of Mass and CEO of Bain Capital fell short. With this logic, the GOP candidate would reasonably fare much better in 2012 than in 2008. Based on the above, it would be reasonable to assume that Romney would do far better than McCain while Obama’s ebbed. But that’s not what the final tally showed. Yes, Obama collected fewer votes the 2nd time around; but given the rise of the TEA Party, patriots and overall anti-Obama forces energized, it is a reasonable presumption that the Romney would garner more votes than McCain. He did NOT. Why? I could understand if Obama’s numbers went down and GOP candidate’s didn’t go up high enough to win, but what I can’t believe is: Romney got fewer votes than McCain, for all the reasons just stated. Something is rotten in Denmark . Obama’s expectations were met; they didn’t stuff the ballot box as feared. On the otherhand, Romney’s vote tally must have been under-counted, understated and under reported. I have refined the search pattern Google àdiebold voting machines 2012 And I repeat WE WAS ROBBED So why isn’t Romney and the GOP challenging the election results. Well Romney can’t; it would sound like sour grapes from a sore loser. As for the GOP, unlike my logical conclusions, they’d need proof to go public. Could be they aren’t up to the fight. Or, maybe they’re waiting for George Soros to confess. The MSM has shown itself to be unreliable. The TEA Party does not have a charismatic leader, by design, to lead such a movement, altho they’d cheerfully jump on someone’s band wagon who led the charge. So do we take it on the chin and accept our future as Sharia-believing non-constitutional-socialists, or what? What else is there? The Administration wasn’t phazed a bit when 2 TEA Party demonstrations put a total of 2 million+ protestors on their front lawn. So that would be a waste of time (altho, It worked in the fall of the USSR ). Outright revolution wouldn’t work, because too many don’t share my/our conclusions (yet). The military are tied to the defense of the Constitution. Nah. No help there. Genl Petreus has already been taken out. Constitutionally, it might be possible to get 34 states to call for a Convention, but that’s premature. (Pelosi isn’t in position to stop it this time; but the current Speaker is not up to the task.) We can accept our fate as part of the permanent underclass, in hopes some future generation will right these wrongs which we find ourselves incapable. The demise of the USA over the next 4 years is inevitable. A hard pill to swallow, for sure. May the victors enjoy their $50K checks from Pigford, their extended employer-financed unemployment benefits, their free birth control pills and Obama phones. God bless America , may she rest in peace. Rich Martin <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> PREVIOUS MESSAGE Extra! Extra! Conclusion leads to collusion to defraud public. People belong in prison, election thrown out. Once upon a time, when I was a freshman in high school, a student named Fred was “asking” other pupils to “borrow” some money before class. Just then I saw my bud Mike walk in. I tried to warn him, but he was on the other side of the classroom. Fred got their first and before he had time to ask, Mike said, “hey Fred, can you loan me lunch money? Remember this story from High school when you Google below. For the last two weeks the TV/radio pundits were all talking about the poll “internals”. One after another they questioned why pollsters were using an unlikely statistic favorable to POTUS. One poll after another the internals revealed that they were using ghe 2008 as model weighted + 2, +4 or even +9 for the Democrat candidate. In other words, they predicted a higher Obama turn out than he got in 2008. With this thumb on the scales, they said in unison, including Karl Rove, the election was too close to call. That’s all we heard going into E-Day. Historically, we have come to learn the polls always favor the Dems until the last week when the pollsters make a serious effort to get it right to protect their reputations will get them jobs next election. That's how it is. VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV NOW Remember this? I posted it Tues AM Final comments on election 2012 R U wondering why nearly every POTUS poll is unexpectedly coming within the margin of error? Only Barone has predicted a winner. Find the answer here. Now would be a good time to think about my bud Mike. Google à diebold voting machines and here(NEW) http://betabeat.com/2012/11/its-way-too-easy-to-hack-some-voting-machines-video/ If the final count is far different from the polls, is it grounds to be suspicious? If they are in alignment, does it support the veracity of the election? Back to current Got it? They polls agreed with the actual vote BECAUSE AN OVERSTATEMENT IN THE POLL AND ADDITIONAL DEMOCRAT VOTE TOTAL AS CALCULATED BY THE MACHINES MATCHED THE OVERSTATED PREDICTIONS. As further evidence, remember not only were the predictions overstated, some polls calculated more democrats were going to cast votes this year than in 2008 when Obama’s popularity peaked. And one final nail in the story, LESS VOTES WERE CAST overall IN 2012 than 2008! CONCLUSION: THE ELECTION WAS A FRAUD! that can’t be proved. BUT Google this any wayà diebold voting machines SOROS Exactly what kind of return did George George Soros expect on his hostile takeover, er, investment in Diebold? And finally, in the language of the govt statisticians: Congressional democrats did unexpectedly well. I was worried that in 4 years there wouldn’t be enough worth saving. Truth is, there might not be enough to save now. Rich Martin REVISED CONCLUSION: WE WAS ROBBED Silly me, I thought vote fraud might be against the law. When replying to this message, plz cc: [email protected] to assure prompt reply. I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q Mrs. Richard "Peggy" Martin (1935 - 2012) http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=margaret-irene-martin-peggy&pid=159081400&fhid=12241#fbLoggedOut http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/dfw/guestbook.aspx?n=margaret-martin&pid=159081400&sort=1 <> <> <> -- To join RichsRants, send email to: [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
