RR Secession: Is it unconstitutial as the MSM claims? Bill, Obviously this SCOTUS decision to strike down the down the 10th Amendment was to justify the Northern aggression Vs the South. Likewise it is just as obvious, it is not based on the written Constitution; it is in fact another example of a corrupt SCOTUS writing new legislation validated by the Might Makes Right "Law of the Jungle" Doctrine. It is in fact, more proof that the Constitution has been trampled to death.
Since the SCOTUS decison is the law of the land, not only has the 10th Bill of Rights been made null and void, the Congress is not limited to the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. IS THAT NOT WHAT SCOTUS RULED? Rich Martin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Bill Walker, FOAVC co-founder" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 4:12 PM Subject: C Rich, It is, according to the Supreme Court and official government documents made prior to the civil war, illegal for a state to leave the union of states. It is not unconstitutional, illegal or otherwise prohibited for a state to withdraw its consent from the form of government created by that union especially if it never consented to that form of government which currently exists. The "form" of government in existence, when every state currently in the Union joined, remains the same; the states', in joining, accepted it. Bill Bill Walker FOAVC Co-Founder http://www.foavc.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: ArticleV Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 12:12 PM Subject: Fwd: RR: RR Secession: Is it unconstitutial as the MSM claims ? Secession: Is it unconstitutial as the MSM claims ? Since no power to prevent secession was ever delegated to Congress, and since secession is not prohibited to the states, it remains a reserved right of the states under the Tenth Amendment. http://lewrockwell.com/woods/woods213.html Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people. What does the above mean to you? This is how I read it: The Federal Govt has authority granted it in the Constitution (Article 8), and nothing more e.g., the fedl govt cannot tell states how much to tax or not tax, nsaor the method to tax state citizens. They cannot prevent or regulate without Constitutional authority. (See below) The rest is the responsibility of the states or We the People. 1sthttp://groups.google.com/group/richsrants/browse_thread/thread/2e8e52bbe7cf30b1 2ndhttp://groups.google.com/group/richsrants/browse_thread/thread/4042764806fb8f7a 3rd http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants/browse_thread/thread/a0f23878012dee8d 4thhttp://groups.google.com/group/richsrants/browse_thread/thread/f3ec871c23ca740b When replying to this message, plz cc: to assure prompt [email protected] TEA Party Nation Top Ten Tips For Getting The Most From Your TPN Membership! http://www.teapartynation.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q Mrs. Richard "Peggy" Martin (1935 - 2012) http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=margaret-irene-martin-peggy&pid=159081400&fhid=12241#fbLoggedOut http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/dfw/guestbook.aspx?n=margaret-martin&pid=159081400&sort=1 <> <> <> -- To join RichsRants, send email to: [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
