Interesting Items
by Alex Gimarc
 
Monday February 11, 2013 
 
Interesting Items 2/11 
 
Howdy all, a few Interesting 
Items for your information. Enjoy –
 
In this issue:
 
1.  King Cove
2.  Murkowski
3.  Rove
4.  Oak Harbor
5.  Drones
6.  Lame Duck?
 
1.  King Cove.  A quarter of 
the way down the Aleutians toward Russia sits the small village of King 
Cove, Alaska.  It has a population of just over 900 Aleuts.  The village is 
across the bay from the second longest airstrip in the state, the 
Cold Bay Airport.  Part of the area around the bay comprises the Izembek 
National Wildlife Refuge, yet another of the innumerable 
(insufferable?) chunks of federal lands grabbed in order to protect 
wildlife – in this case, nesting birds.  Periodically, people at King 
Cove get sick and need to medevac out to the nearest hospital, usually 
to Anchorage.  This requires larger aircraft that need a large piece of 
concrete to operate out of, in this case the Cold Bay Airport.  There 
are only two ways to get people from King Cove to the airport.  One 
would be via a proposed ten mile long gravel road around the bay, which a 
little more than a mile would be through the wildlife refuge hugging 
the coastline.  The State of Alaska proposed the standard 4:1 land swap 
with the Department of the Interior for permission to build the road.  
Last week, Obama’s Loathsome Cowboy Ken Salazar decided to let them eat 
cake, turning down the land swap in order to save the birds.  Interior’s 
solution?  A 6-8 mile long hovercraft trip across Cold Bay.  The thing 
about the Aleutians is that weather is always a factor, usually nasty or worse. 
 Last summer, a group of Interior employees rode a hovercraft 
across the bay in less than ideal weather and a bunch of them came off 
the craft seasick.  What a great way to transport people to a Medevac 
flight (/sarc).  The decision has the Alaska congressional delegation up in 
arms, and will very likely be a topic of discussion for confirmation hearings 
for Obama’s nomination to replace Salazar.  Of course, if the 
delegation were to start defunding Interior and Fish and Wildlife, 
transferring responsibility for public lands here in Alaska back to 
Alaska, this problem would go away.  This one is not over yet and should be fun 
to watch.
 
2.  Murkowski.  Last year 
before the electoral disaster in November, it looked like Republicans 
had a small chance to retake the majority in the US Senate.  Had that 
happened, Lisa Murkowski (R, AK) would have been the Chairman of the 
Senate Energy and National Resources Committee.  As it turned out, she 
ended up as the ranking member.  Her office had written up a proposed 
set of things to do and she released it early last week, entitled 
“Energy 20/20, a vision for America’s energy future.”  Overall, it is a 
pretty good document, essentially proposing more drilling, more fracing, more 
production, fewer regulations, and more generation.  This is a 
significant improvement from her position in 2007, which used the move 
to a carbon tax as a vehicle to send more federal money into Alaska.  
There is little mention of manmade global warming.  Unfortunately, there are 16 
of the 123 total pages spent on renewable energy, which has 
turned into a corrupt vehicle to 
launder federal energy grants through 
failing business models into the pockets of democrat political 
campaigns.  She spends four pages on nuclear energy, making the case for 
significant regulatory reform.  Perhaps the worst bunny trail this 
document travels are the eight pages spent on “consuming less” energy, 
which makes the case for electric vehicles among other boondoggles.  
Given where she stood five years ago, this is a vast improvement, 
especially the regulatory reform piece of it.  It does acknowledge the 
new world of energy abundance here in the US, but does not discard 
entirely the unproductive outdated and irresponsible baggage of 
renewables, efficiency, and climate change.  It takes a while for things to 
change in Washington, especially in congress.  She and her office 
should be congratulated for the move to a significantly more sane energy 
policy.  We will see how much of it makes it into actual legislation.  
You can find the document here:  
http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republican-news?ID=58c77992-0362-47c9-bd53-ab121f1c4414
 
3.  Rove.  Last week, Karl 
Rove declared war on the TEA Party.  Rove heads up a pair of outside 
groups – American Crossroads and Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies which 
spent over $127 million in support of Mitt Romney for President 
in 2012.  Rove backed candidates lost 
10 of 12 senate races and four of 
nine house races according to Michelle Malkin on Monday.  Rove’s 
announcement was the use of his big money investors to fight TEA Party 
primary challenges to RINO incumbents in 2014.  Rove clearly has the ear of his 
investors who apparently are not concerned with any successful 
return on their investment in the political process.  Additionally, 
expect this effort to lay the groundwork for a Jeb Bush presidential run – all 
insider backed – in 2016.  Malkin and Levin were all over this 
last week, with Levin being particularly pyrotechnic.  Rove’s problem is that 
he and his political acumen are recent and regular election 
losers, as his last big win was Bush’s reelection in 2004.  Since then, 
his backed candidates have lost a huge number of senate and house seats 
in 2006, more senate seats and the presidency in 2008, and more senate 
seats and the presidency again in 2012.  The single election that 
conservatives did well during that time was 2010, which the TEA Party 
led the fight, and Rove’s people were dragged kicking and screaming into the 
fight and took credit for the successful outcome.  Malkin’s piece 
can be found here.  It is fun reading:  
http://michellemalkin.com/2013/02/04/kneel-before-zod-gop-control-freak-karl-rove-launches-new-effort-to-snuff-out-tea-party/
 
4.  Oak Harbor.  Oak Harbor 
is a small town on an island north of Seattle.  As such, it is infested 
with democrat politicians that have Seattle’s leftist views on civil 
rights.  The latest example comes when a city councilman went after a 
citizen testifying against restrictions on firearms carry in municipal 
parks.  The citizen was carrying a concealed weapon while at the meeting and 
the councilman went after him during the testimony, demanding he 
remove and surrender his firearm because it wasn’t needed at the 
meeting.  The citizen ended up talking about the Second Amendment.  The 
Mayor also got into the act later in the meeting.  The meeting took 
place on January 15 and has a video of the exchange up on You Tube.  
Local gun owners took exception to this abuse of authority by yet 
another elected democrat and showed up at last Tuesday’s meeting in 
force.  There were over 160 in attendance and most were armed – some 
concealed and some not.  Some carried rifles, scary rifles.  The 
councilman who started the festivities couldn’t stand the pushback and 
got up and walked out.  One citizen mocked his faux outrage telling him 
that he had a concealed ham sandwich and that he shouldn’t feel 
threatened by its presence.  Is it me, or does it seem that people 
aren’t playing the democrats’ game anymore?  No decision on the 
ordinance banning firearms in public parks was made.
 
5.  Drones.  Interesting 
movement from the left on Obama’s use of unmanned drones to kill people 
thought to be terrorists.  Since he has taken office, Obama has 
increasingly used drones to kill people across the Middle East – from 
Pakistan to North Africa.  The kill list is prepared by National 
Security Advisor and CIA nominee John 
Brennan.  Obama picks who will die that particular day and kills the guy (along 
with whoever else is 
within the frag envelope).  Last week he killed a 16-year-old American 
citizen who decided to go to Yemen and play terrorist.  Rumor is 
that 
he gets off by watching the live video of the strikes.  
Now when Bush was 
doing this at a low level, the civil rights crowd was apoplectic.  
During the far more energetic program being conducted by Obama these 
days, the silence was until recently, deafening.  Congress has started 
asking the same administration that has trotted out all sorts of 
rationale for inserting enemy combatants into the federal courts for 
their trials, why Americans playing terrorist overseas do not get the 
exact same rights.  This is a good question, as the Rules of Engagement 
should apply across the board, especially from this crowd.  Of course, 
Obama’s racist (In)Justice Attorney General Eric Holder is in complete 
agreement with the program and has written supportive opinions.  And the
 questions are starting to be asked from places and people you would not
 expect them to come from for this president.  It is always nice to 
apply Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals to the Radical in Chief himself and 
his henchmen.
 
6.  Lame 
Duck?  This last one is probably wishful thinking, but does it seem to anyone 
else that 
Obama is having a bit more trouble in the beginning of his second term 
than one would expect, especially with congressional Republicans running for 
the hills?  For example, his nominee for SECDEF, one Chuck Hagel 
testified last week and demonstrated that he was a complete idiot.  His 
nomination is in some serious jeopardy with a pair of Republicans 
promising to filibuster it.  His gun control demands have gone nowhere 
in congress, though senate democrats are making noises about passing 
universal background check legislation.  He has been asked by senate 
democrats to stay out of the immigration workup.  As usual, he has 
ignored the request. As reported above, the civil rights crowd is 
starting to make noises about the drone program which will not go well.  
Funniest of all is the impending sequestration – something that will 
actually cut spending by a miniscule amount – but a cut nonetheless.  
After months being beaten like dogs, the House majority is going to 
stand by and let the cuts go into effect, as they are completely unable 
to negotiate in good faith with either the senate majority or the WH.  
And at this point, the democrats and the WH are getting very, very 
worried – mostly because nobody outside of DoD will notice any impact 
with the automatic spending cuts.  This is going to be most interesting 
to watch.
 
More later -
 
- AG
 
"If ye love wealth better 
than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating 
contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels 
or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains 
set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our 
countrymen." 
- Samuel Adams, 
speech at the Philadelphia 
  State House, August 1, 
1776.
 
Note: Interesting Items can 
be found at the following locations:
Our Home Page http://interestingitems.org/
Archives can be found at  http://home.gci.net/~agimarc
Anchorage Daily Planet http://www.anchoragedailyplanet.com/
MatSu Valley News http://matsuvalleynews.blogspot.com/
Subscriber and supporter 
Elbert Collins at http://thatselbert.wordpress.com/
Rod Martin's The Vanguard 
site is also a long-time supporter of this column: http://www.thevanguard.org/

 
The Ponder
By Shonda Ponder
Updates daily
Just visit http://www.shondaponder.com 

 
 When replying to this message, 
plz cc: [email protected]
to assure
 prompt
 reply. 
 
TEA Party Nation
Top Ten Tips For Getting The Most From Your TPN 
Membership!
http://www.teapartynation.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

 
I’m as mad as hell,
and I’m not going 
to take it any more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q

Mrs. Richard "Peggy" Martin (1935 - 2012) 
  
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=margaret-irene-martin-peggy&pid=159081400&fhid=12241#fbLoggedOut
 
   
http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/dfw/guestbook.aspx?n=margaret-martin&pid=159081400&sort=1
   
   
 
<> <> <>

-- 
-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RichsRants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to