SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CONCEALED ASSETS

It is this type of media mal-practice that has allowed our political 
institutions to become corrupt. 
With such corruption at the top, respect for
 lower courts are diminished as well. 
Putting a person who has such disrespect for the rule of law on the top rung of 
our judicial 
system is a stain on both the media and the U.S. Judicial system that's not 
easily corrected.


For all practical purposes, this blight will remain part of the Judiciary for a 
few more decades.
Even an all-Republican govt would hesitate to oust the first female Hispanic on 
SCOTUS.

Google --->  Sotomayor concealed assets


(Remember the good old days when an active press led to the removal of a 
Justice of the 

Supreme Court for working with President LBJ to help fashion legislation so it 
would pass 
Constitutional muster?) 


More proof: the Constitution has lost its effectiveness and needs an upgrade.

It is one more example of politically-correct driven decisions that can only be 
rectified 
by the states convening an Article V Convention.


Another judicial decision being ignored
Second appeals court invalidates Obama's 
NLRB recess …
POLITICO10 days ago
Second appeals court invalidates Obama's NLRB ... appointments to the 
National Labor Relations 
Board were ... allowed to form a union by one such NLRB ...

And speaking of political correctness, I wonder, is it still permissible to say 
God Bless America in America? 


Or is it just banned from the govt public schools?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnQDW-NMaRs




Here's details of the should-be scandal covered -up by the MSM


________________________________
 From: dr.richard.cordero.esq
Reply-to: Agroupdiscussionforum@ yahoogroups.com
To: JAIL-Legal-Discussions@ yahoogroups.com
Sent: 5/25/2013 9:03:03 P.M. Central 
  Daylight Time
Subj: [Agroupdiscussionforum] Re: [JAIL-Legal-Discussions] 
  Trifecta of Distrust: 
IRS, Benghazi, and the President’s cover-up of the 
  concealment of assets of his first Supreme Court nominee
 
 
>http://www.scribd.com/doc/89433087/12-04-14-Alleged-Deception-by-Then-Supreme-Court-Nominee-Sotomayor-Through-Concealment-of-Assets-Dr-Richard-Cordero-s
>
>
>THE TRIFECTA OF DISTRUST
>In the context of the IRS Scandal and the Benghazi  Scandal
>the investigation of the suspicion raised  by
>The  New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico
>that President Obama’s first nominee to the Supreme  Court,
>Then-Judge Sotomayor, had concealed assets
>can have the gravest consequences,  including
>calls for their resignation or impeachment,  and
>the first-ever investigation of the Federal  Judiciary
> 
>By
>Dr. Richard  Cordero, Esq.
>Judicial Discipline Reform
>Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@gmail. com
>New  York City
> 
>The IRS and the Benghazi scandals have gripped the NATIONAL public’s  
>attention and, as a result, have given journalists a market incentive to  
>investigate them further. Underlying both scandals is a common query: 
> 
>Is there a pattern of President Obama covering up wrongdoing by him,  his 
>administration, or those whom he wants to nominate to high office? Cf. 
>http://Judicial-Discipline- Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero- 
>Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>jur:111fn249.
> 
>In fact, this pattern began early on in his first term when he  nominated for 
>cabinet positions known tax cheats Tim Geithner, Tom Daschle,  and Nancy 
>Killefer, none of whom were confirmed; id. >jur:65§1.
> 
>Subsequently, media outlets of superior credibility and even said to  be 
>liberal and Democrat-leaning, namely, The New York Times, The  Washington 
>Post, and Politico, suspected the President’s first nominee  to the Supreme 
>Court, Then-Judge, Now-Justice, Sotomayor, of concealing  assets of her 
>own;jur:65fn107a.
> 
>This begs a question that entered our political discourse when the  Watergate 
>scandal, which led to the resignation of President Nixon on August  9, 1974, 
>brought it to the attention of the NATIONAL public and that today  can guide 
>journalists in yet another investigation after being rephrased  thus:
> 
>What did President Obama know 
>through the FBI vetting of Then-Judge Sotomayor  about her concealment of 
>assets, and 
>when did he know it? jur:77§5 
> 
>The President knew, jur:90§§b-c, or by exercising due diligence  before making 
>a nomination for life-appointment to the Supreme Court should  have known of 
>the evidence of J. Sotomayor’s concealment of assets. He only  had to list the 
>salary that she had earned as a public officer and compare  it with the assets 
>and liabilities that she declared under oath, jur:65§107b-c, and then wonder, 
>as did The New  York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico: Where did her  
>money go?! 
> 
>The evidence of her concealment of assets  disqualified her as a judge, not to 
>mention as a justiceship nominee,  because it revealed her failure of a 
>fundamental requirement for judges: ‘to avoid even the appearance of  
>impropriety’, jur:68fn123a. This failure forced Supreme Court  Justice Abe 
>Fortas to resign on May 14, 1969, after Life magazine revealed  his money 
>improprieties, id. >jur:92§d.  By contrast, concealment of assets, whether to 
>avoid taxes or hide the  unlawful origin of money, is a crime; dcc:13fn27.
> 
>Knowing of her concealment of assets, the  President intentionally saddled the 
>American public for the next 20, 30, or  more years of J. Sotomayor’s 
>justiceship with a dishonest person who was  unqualified to say the law that 
>she had violated by concealing assets and  who had to continue violating the 
>law by not declaring such assets, lest she  incriminate herself, jur:68§3.
> 
>The President had a powerful motive to  cover up J. Sotomayor’s concealment of 
>assets: To gain political capital by  ingratiating himself with Hispanic 
>voters who wanted a Hispanic on the  Supreme Court. He violated the public 
>trust that he appealed to when he  falsely vouched for her honesty and 
>qualifications and asked the public to  support his nominee.
> 
>In the context of the suspected cover-up  in the IRS and the Benghazi scandal, 
>President Obama’s cover-up of the  evidence of J. Sotomayor’s concealment of 
>assets confirms a pattern: for  political gain, he covers up his and other 
>people’s wrongdoing. It completes a trifecta of distrust. 
> 
>The distrust that this cover-up can  engender is of greater gravity because, 
>unlike in the other two scandals,  the President personally vouched for 
>Then-Judge Sotomayor’s honesty and  qualifications. It warrants the call by 
>the public and journalists for him  to release the FBI vetting report on J. 
>Sotomayor.
> 
>The trifecta of distrust justifies the  search by journalists for the 
>whereabouts of J. Sotomayor’s concealed  assets. In so doing, they will gain a 
>competitive advantage by joining  forces with a media outlet that after a 
>15-month investigation of 2.5  million financial documents leaked to it, known 
>as the Offshore Leaks, has  developed unparalleled expertise, including 
>techniques, software, and  contacts, in conducting off- and onshore Follow the 
>money! investigations, namely, the International Consortium of Investigative  
>Journalists.
> 
>They are headquartered at the Center for  Public Integrity in Washington, D.C. 
>This is their contact  information:
> 
>ICIJ Director Gerard Ryle: [email protected]
>ICIJ Deputy Director Marina Walker: [email protected]
>CPI Director Bill Buzenberg: [email protected]
>tel. 1(202)466-1300. 
> 
>For the physical address of, and links  to, ICIJ and CPI, and a concrete 
>proposal to them for joint publication and  investigation of evidence, and an 
>academic and business venture, see http://Judicial-Discipline- 
>Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero- Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>ol:1. 
> 
>The journalist and the managing editor  who start the process of highlighting 
>to ultimately the NATIONAL public the  trifecta of distrust completed by 
>President Obama’s cover-up of J.  Sotomayor’s concealment of assets can have a 
>far-reaching public impact: 
> 
>1. launch  a Watergate-like generalized Follow the money! search for J.  
>Sotomayor’s concealed assets; jur:4¶¶10-14;
> 
>2. set off  the first-ever media investigation of the means, motive, and 
>opportunity, jur:21§§1-3, that enable justices and  judges to conceal assets 
>in spite of their duty, jur:65fn107d, to file annual financial disclosure  
>reports, jur:105fn213;  and
> 
>3.  exacerbate public distrust far beyond what the other two scandals already  
>have and to the point of prompting calls for the resignation or impeachment  
>of both President Obama and Justice Sotomayor and other judges as well as  for 
>an overhaul of the Federal Judiciary, jur:158§§6-8.
> 
>For the journalist and managing editor  that set in motion this investigative 
>bandwagon there are substantial moral  and material rewards, ol:3§6, including 
> becoming known to a grateful NATIONAL public as Champions of the Public  
>Trust.
> 
>Dare trigger history! id. >dcc:11
>****************************** ************* 
>
 
How it was reported
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/ mail.cgi/r/alerts/ 464423883465/
______________


Google ---> Judge Sotomayor, had concealed assets


 When replying to this message, 
plz cc: [email protected]
to assure prompt reply. 
 
TEA Party Nation
Top Ten Tips For Getting The Most From Your TPN Membership!
http://www.teapartynation.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

 
I’m as mad as hell,
and I’m not going to take it any more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q

Mrs. Richard "Peggy" Martin (1935 - 2012) 
  
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=margaret-irene-martin-peggy&pid=159081400&fhid=12241#fbLoggedOut
 
   
http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/dfw/guestbook.aspx?n=margaret-martin&pid=159081400&sort=1
   
   
 
<> <> <>

-- 
-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RichsRants" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to