>     Seems that AERC put quite a reward in its recognition of the >
difficulty > of completing a 100 miles as compared, say, to completing an
LD or a  50.

I don't have any gripes with how the points are dished out, but if I were
only worried about points I wouldn't necessarily concentrate on doing
100's.  I can be first in my weight division and get 150 pts. on a 50, or
I can complete a 100 without placement and get 150.  The entry fee is
lower for the 50, the breeze is better, my chances of getting pulled or
lost after dark are lower, *and* I can do another race in 2 weeks, while
I give more time off after a 100.  I enter 100's because I like the pace,
I like riding with a crowd of experienced horses, and in my mind I am
keeping score.  My horse has completed 7- 100's.  I want 10 100's...just
because I do. There's no official title for that, but I'd sure love to be
able to say he did 10.  After that, I guess I'd like to say he did 15.  
Maybe the reason I like to do a 100 is that when I start, I honestly
don't know if I *can*.  I pretty much know that if nothing major goes
wrong, I can do a 50. Maybe the time to try a 100 is when you know you
*can* do a 50 not when you know you can do 100.

Angie

On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 09:56:58 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Seems to me when a horse and rider received triple points, i.e., 450 
> points 
> (and more) for completing and doing well in a hundred, finding 
> yourself 
> higher in the regional standings (for those who compete in that 
> particular 
> vein) was quite a reward for completing a hundred.  
>     Seems that AERC put quite a reward in its recognition of the 
> difficulty 
> of completing a 100 miles as compared, say, to completing an LD or a 
> 50.
>     So, it seems that going to a 100 and completing was rather 
> important.  
> Horses were then given the proper rest and recovery after those 
> 100's as a 
> rider wasn't compelled to zip on over to the next 50 in pursuit of 
> the highly 
> coveted jacket recognizing regional excellence.
>     Hasn't AERC quit "recognizing" the higher degree of difficulty 
> of 
> completing a 100 miler as compared to completing rides of shorter 
> distances 
> by the number of points it now awards?
>     (I'm sorry, I haven't kept up with how many points one gets for 
> completing rides these days...)
> 
>      Frank.
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
>  Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 


________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Reply via email to