Start your list. Jackie and I have selected you to carry the lance. I know the BOD will be happy to see you on your white steed storming the castle door:-). I'm sure they would rather we just vote on them rather than expect to understand them.
Truman
Bob Morris wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Some very interesting questions are being brought forth. Do we assume that the AERC Board of Directors are reading them and will answer or do we assemble all the questions and then direct them to the Board?The Board is the entity that developed, approved and submitted the revised By-laws. It is their responsibility to answer the memberships concerns.BobBob Morris
Morris Endurance Enterprises
Boise, ID-----Original Message-----In a message dated 4/15/02 2:47:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RC] AERC By-law revisions
In such a context if you have no financial interest which could be impacted by the out come of the vote you are not in conflict of interest. A vet voting on veterinary rules would not be in such a conflict
Actually, Truman, a "conflict of interest" does not have to be financial. If a BOD member is having to vote on an issue that holds a personal interest. Say if it has to do with a family member, such as a grievance or protest, either for or against the family member, the BOD member would be in a "conflict of interest". Then it would be appropriate for the BOD member to abstain. Being a family organization, this is quite possible and should be taken seriously. Do you agree?
Jackie Baker
