>
> 
>RR -1. CRI at all rides at all Vet Checks  NOT AT THE FINISH.
>
The CRI is an invaluable parameter. It's pretty easy to use. If the 
starting pulse is low in say 52 or less, it may not be all that useful. 
But I would prefer to leave it up to the vet to use it if he feels he 
needs additional data on which to base his decision. I would prefer to 
have it used at all checks so I have the information. I see no reason 
not to have this information at the finish.

>
>RR- 2. NO chasing hazing of horses by anyone at the VC to obtain a trot.
>
Training issue. Let the vet decide which horses are too tired to trot 
and which are just being pains in the butt. AERC is not FEI - lets not 
start adopting their vetting criteria.

>
>RR- 3. Fix COMPLETION PULSE to 64 for 50 miles and up (NO more lower 60
>pulse=
>for completion).
>
At a ride in the SE some time ago I asked our P&R timer to record pulse 
along with time. The criteria was 64. All but a few horses were less 
than 60 when presented. I could see very little difference a 60 criteria 
would have made.  I see not reason to use 60 over 64 or 64 over 60. I do 
hear a lot of ramblings over 60 being better. I sure would like to see 
some valid scientific experiments run to validate this. But in general I 
just as soon see a set 64.

>
>RR- 4. Completion time at finish LEFT as is at one hour - includes pulse
>recov=
>ery and vet out process. (NOT the 30 minute pulse recovery I have seen at
>a few rides)
>
The way I read the rules it is one hour. Until the rules are changes it 
should be one hour.

>
>RR- 5. More then ONE VC on 50 milers and above. Some standard on the
>number of VC per mileage and conditions- yes within reason- may not
>apply=
>to ALL
>rides.
>

This is an issue that should be studied by the vet committee with a 
recommendation to the board. If there are valid reasons to do this - 
then it should be done.

>



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Reply via email to