Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sequence: 211 Precedence: list X-no-archive: yes List-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe%20rietveld_l> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe%20rietveld_l> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Owner: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Luca, Not true. Polarization from incident beam monochromator is same correction & same formulas as for diffracted beam monochromator. Problem is symmetric wrt Azaroff's equations. Bob Von Dreele On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:25:15 +0200 Luca Lutterotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Primary monochromator don't need such correction, > > Best regards, > Luca Lutterotti > >On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 10:36 AM, Natale >Perchiazzi wrote: > >>What about a primary Ge monochromator? >> >>Best regards Natale Perchiazzi >> >> >>Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra >>Via S.Maria 53 >>56126 Pisa ITALIA >>fax +39050500932 >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>www.dst.unipi.it >> >
