Dear Natale,

I think you are seeing two effects instead of one.

First of all, you will indeed see Co fluorescence. Cu K-Alpha1 is able to excite Co fluorescence very efficiently, as mentioned already by Jens.
The choice of optics and radiation with this type of samples can be tricky when you work without a diffracted beam monochromator. I looked into the fluorescence issue last year, I can send you some papers if you are interested.

The strength of the fluorescence signal, however, should be constant as you irradiate a constant volume of material.

The fact that you observe an increasing background towards high angle suggests that your sample absorbs most of the X-rays. If the signal mainly comes from the first micrometers of material in the capillary it explains why the background is increasing towards high angles (your detector starts to see more of the side of the capillary that is irradiated by the incident beam). What is the thickness of the capillary you are using? What is the compound you are investigating?

With best regards,
Martijn



Dr. Martijn J. Fransen
Product Manager XRD
PANalytical
Lelyweg 1
7602 EA  Almelo, The Netherlands
Phone ++31 546 534 345
Fax ++ 31 546 534 598
Take a look at our new website! www.panalytical.com






"Natale Perchiazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

11/06/2004 03:39 PM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
unusual background





Dear All,
performing a scan of a Co compound, in capillary setup, with CuKa1 primary
monochromated radiation, PSD detector, I get a bkgd decreasing as usual
from 10 to 50�, but then constantly increasing from 50� up to my upper
scan limit (100�). I have no ready aexplanation for this, and your
suggestions will be welcome.
Best regards        Natale Perchiazzi


Spam detection software, running on the system "lima.ill.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for details.

Content preview:  This is a multipart message in MIME format.
  --=_alternative 005844B8C1256F45_Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear
  Natale, I think you are seeing two effects instead of one. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (6.3 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.3 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
 0.2 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.7 HTML_20_30             BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML
 5.1 PORN_4                 URI: URL uses words/phrases which indicate porn


Reply via email to