Dear All:

Recently we performed some measurements using a MAR345 detector. As we knew the ambient temperature and pressure lattice constants for the sample, we used this information for the sample to image plate and tilt correction calibration in FIT2D. We then used this sample to plate and tilt information to perform an integration of the same image that was used for the calibration. If we take the integrated data and perform a LeBail fit in GSAS we can not get a good fit to the data without introducing a zero shift (this does not make sense to me). Additionally, after refining the zero shift, the lattice constant that we get back is different from that used in the original calibration! Essentially the peak positions in the integrated data do not agree with the peak positions that were used in the calibration. Any ideas as to what might be going wrong?

                                Thanks in advance, Angus


Dr. Angus P. Wilkinson School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Prof. Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology
Prof. Materials Science and Engineering                 770 State St.
                                                Atlanta, GA 30332-0400
                                                Tel: 404 894 4036
Fax: 404 894 7452

Reply via email to