On 31-aug-05, at 15:31, F Baube wrote:
You had suggested,
Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Geert Bevin:
* If I wish to have the previous behavior, is
there some other API method that I can use ?
No, this behavior is needed to ensure the consistancy and to be able
to build upon it. If you only want to fill in certain properties,
* set the editable(false) constraint on the properties that you
don't want to fill, or
* only declare the properties that you want to fill in the
submission declaration, or
* you can create beans that are merely 'transfer' data structures
and that you can use to declare the submission parameters with,
you should be able to fill another bean with it.
The first sounds like it could be computationally intensive,
judging by other posts I've read. Possibly ugly code, too.
Not at all, it's the recommended approach. We use this all the time.
The third sounds attractive if the "transfer" class is a new
base class for the full class, but since this does not corres-
pond to any class that has any conceptual justification, I can
not justify this approach.
Why not? Backend data storage classes are not the only classes that
are important in your system.
The second seems to be the most appropriate.
To me it seems the least appropriate since you'll need to declare
each parameter manually and make sure they are in sync with the bean.
--
Geert Bevin Uwyn bvba
"Use what you need" Avenue de Scailmont 34
http://www.uwyn.com 7170 Manage
gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com Tel +32 64 84 80 03
PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619 719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
Public PGP key : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
