|
Not quite, we discussed using actual velocity templates rather than
"inspired" syntax. As Geert has mentioned, many people are put off by
the current syntax because it is unlike any other templating system. I
reckon if people could use a templating mechanism that they are used to
Rife would gain much greater adoption. You can see what was discussed here; http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=39529 In my situation I *have* to work with designers, I'd like to move to Rife, but I can't inflict that decision on the rest of the team. It should be largely transparent to them. Emmanuel Okyere wrote: I'm not sure it talked about "using velocity for templates"; rife gives you a choice on the template syntax to use, which all compiles back to the same thinghere's the thread you are looking for from the mailing list: http://lists.uwyn.com/pipermail/rife-users/2006-February/019612.html cheers, eokyere On 3/22/06, Graham O'Regan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Geert: Just picking up from the TSS thread about using velocity for templates (I use the name analogboy on TSS). Can you give me a few pointers on where to start with that? _______________________________________________ Rife-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users-- Mohandas Gandhi - "My life is my message." _______________________________________________ Rife-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users |
_______________________________________________ Rife-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
