Hi Pierre,
that sounds good :-)
Take care,
Geert
On 12 Apr 2006, at 09:38, Raoul Pierre wrote:
Geert,
good points. The next question is then, why not make
"atTopPriority" the default one? Wouldn't that make everybody
happy through a single method API? Is it needed to be able to add
at the bottom?
So, what about:
- keep the actual three addResourceBundle(s) without atTopPriority
argument: by default the added bundle(s) will be put in top priority,
- when bottom priority needed, then the caller retrieves the list
itself with getResources, and works directly on the list.
Regards
Pierre
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
--
Geert Bevin Uwyn bvba GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Use what you need" Avenue de Scailmont 34 Skype: gbevin
http://www.uwyn.com 7170 Manage, Belgium AIM: geertbevin
gbevin at uwyn dot com Tel: +32 64 84 80 03 Mobile: +32 477 302 599
PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619 719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
Public PGP key : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
